IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ledbat] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-08.txt

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Mon, 10 October 2011 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: ledbat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ledbat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5610221F8C0C for <ledbat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4PvU2qmtERvK for <ledbat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E425F21F8BFE for <ledbat@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9AHkVIg027006 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E932F77.5060006@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:46:31 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
References: <4E92338F.1030601@fandm.edu> <4E93032B.7090006@isi.edu> <201110101846.26115.mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
In-Reply-To: <201110101846.26115.mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: Janardhan Iyengar <jana.iyengar@gmail.com>, ledbat@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ledbat] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-08.txt
X-BeenThere: ledbat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of the LEDBAT WG <ledbat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ledbat>, <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ledbat>
List-Post: <mailto:ledbat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ledbat>, <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:46:48 -0000

On 10/10/2011 9:46 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wouldn't want to refer to TCP's value because of a less-than-best-effort
> traffic there might always be a motivation to take different/lower values
> than TCP.

The values currently suggested are TCP's current values. I don't mind if 
you want to pick smaller ones, but I'd suggest spec'ing them relative to 
TCP's current values regardless.

Joe

>
> Mirja
>
>
> On Monday 10 October 2011 16:37:31 Joe Touch wrote:
>> On 10/9/2011 4:51 PM, Janardhan Iyengar wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> A new version of the congestion control draft is in the repository.
>>> There are two major mods in this revision:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> 2/ We have set the values for INIT_CWND to 4 and MIN_CWND to 2, and have
>>> clarified the discussion of CURRENT_DELAYS and INIT_CWND/MIN_CWND in
>>> Section 3.5.
>>
>> It might be more stable to refer to TCP's INIT_CWND and MIN_CWND values,
>> i.e., that ledbat should use TCP's values for these.
>>
>> (they've been under discussion for revision in TCPM, FWIW)
>>
>> Joe
>> _______________________________________________
>> ledbat mailing list
>> ledbat@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ledbat
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email