RE: [lemonade] Profile extensions "under discussion"

"Stephane H. Maes" <stephane.maes@oracle.com> Wed, 31 May 2006 03:54 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlHn4-0003ZQ-Dv; Tue, 30 May 2006 23:54:38 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlHn2-0003ZK-RU for lemonade@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 23:54:36 -0400
Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlHn0-0001JD-FS for lemonade@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 23:54:36 -0400
Received: from rgmsgw300.us.oracle.com (rgmsgw300.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.49]) by rgminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.6/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id k4V3sWL2017117 for <lemonade@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 May 2006 21:54:33 -0600
Received: from us.oracle.com (dhcp-amer-whq-csvpn-gw3-141-144-80-93.vpn.oracle.com [141.144.80.93]) by rgmsgw300.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k4V3sTW3005939 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for <lemonade@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 May 2006 21:54:32 -0600
From: "Stephane H. Maes" <stephane.maes@oracle.com>
To: Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service enivronments <lemonade@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [lemonade] Profile extensions "under discussion"
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 20:54:29 -0700
Organization: Oracle
Message-ID: <20060530205429046.00000005016@smaes-lap3>
In-Reply-To: <8556.1148543894.731843@peirce.dave.cridland.net>
X-Mailer: Oracle Connector for Outlook 10.1.2.0.3 71207 (11.0.8010)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI=
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI=
X-Whitelist: TRUE
X-Whitelist: TRUE
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b7b9551d71acde901886cc48bfc088a6
X-BeenThere: lemonade@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "stephane.maes@oracle.com" <stephane.maes@oracle.com>
List-Id: Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service enivronments <lemonade.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:lemonade@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: lemonade-bounces@ietf.org

Yes I do not believe that his si what we have decided...

Note however the proposal to dea with this in draft-ietf-lemonade-convert-03.

Thanks

Stephane 


_____
Stephane H. Maes, PhD,
Director of Architecture, Mobile, Voice, and Communications Platforms, Oracle.
Ph: +1-203-300-7786 (mobile/SMS); Fax / Office UM: +1-650-607-6296
e-mail: stephane.maes@oracle.com
IM: shmaes (AIM/Y!/skype) or stephane_maes@hotmail.com (MSN Messenger) or stephane.maes@gmail.com (Google)




-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Cridland [mailto:dave@cridland.net] 
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:58 AM
To: Randall Gellens
Cc: Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service enivronments
Subject: Re: [lemonade] Profile extensions "under discussion"

On Thu May 25 02:44:49 2006, Randall Gellens wrote:
> At 5:42 PM +0100 5/19/06, Dave Cridland wrote:
>
>>  6) TLS compression / Deflate etc.
>>
>>  Included Everything: I don't feel there is any clear consensus on 
>> compression. My working copy currently has a section on compression 
>> in IMAP which includes two alternate paragraphs for LZIP and 
>> COMPRESS=DEFLATE.
>
> My sense was that Ned and several others made compelling arguments 
> that we should go with something like DEFLATE, and that there was no 
> benefit to per-object client control, since there were no cases where 
> a client capable of decompression would not want it when the server 
> thought an object would benefit from it.  Therefore DEFLATE controlled 
> by a single command from the client that says "compress at will".
>
>
That was my thought too, but the minutes (which include an Action for Pete to summarize the positions to "sharpen consensus"), and the slides from Lemonade Day 2 of IETF65, don't seem to quite indicate that.


>>  8) Proxy / firewalls
>>
>>  Informative: I'll include the document as an informative reference.
>
> Which document?

Firewall traversal using HTTP.

Deployments is currently referenced, too.

Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave@cridland.net - xmpp:dwd@jabber.org
  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade

_______________________________________________
lemonade mailing list
lemonade@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade


_______________________________________________
lemonade mailing list
lemonade@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade