RE: [lemonade] Recommended timeouts for BDAT/BURL?

Having written draft-burger-smtp-rdlv-00 back in August 2004, I think
it's about time to get this done :-)

Alexey - you're now writing more than me :-))

Randy, want the XML source?

-----Original Message-----
From: Randall Gellens [mailto:randy@qualcomm.com] 
Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 12:11 PM
To: Alexey Melnikov
Cc: Lemonade WG
Subject: Re: [lemonade] Recommended timeouts for BDAT/BURL?

At 4:22 PM +0100 7/9/06, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

>  Randall Gellens wrote:
>
>>  At 9:18 PM +0100 7/6/06, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>>
>>>   So I guess the timeout for BDAT/BURL "LAST"  should be 10 
>>> minutes as well. What about non-last BDAT/BURL?
>>
>>  We had some discussion of this a while back (maybe a year or 
>> two?). As I recall, there seemed to be some agreement that the 
>> current SMTP timeouts were too large for mobile clients and could 
>> be reduced for lemonade.
>
>  Ok. Is this something we want to cover in Lemonade Profile bis?

I think we need to, yes.

>>  Also, there was some discussion of adding intermediate "command in 
>> progress" responses to let the client know that the server hadn't 
>> vanished.
>
>  You reminded me that I actually volunteered to co-edit it :-).

I'm happy to help with that.

We should probably try and get rough consensus in the group that it 
is something we still want to do.

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly-selected tag: ---------------
Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.

_______________________________________________
lemonade mailing list
lemonade@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade

_______________________________________________
lemonade mailing list
lemonade@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade