[lemonade] Proposed OMA liaison
"Glenn Parsons" <gparsons@nortel.com> Tue, 20 March 2007 08:08 UTC
Return-path: <lemonade-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HTZOS-0005cU-13; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 04:08:32 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HTZOQ-0005cP-Gg for lemonade@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 04:08:30 -0400
Received: from zrtps0kn.nortel.com ([47.140.192.55]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HTZOO-0002EF-SU for lemonade@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 04:08:30 -0400
Received: from zcarhxm0.corp.nortel.com (zcarhxm0.corp.nortel.com [47.129.230.95]) by zrtps0kn.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id l2K88G522767 for <lemonade@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:08:16 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 04:08:01 -0400
Message-ID: <085091CB2CA14E4B8B163FFC37C84E9D0EF2B987@zcarhxm0.corp.nortel.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Proposed OMA liaison
Thread-Index: AcdqxbGfYFGKfNSYQbO/FtRBtpvjnA==
From: Glenn Parsons <gparsons@nortel.com>
To: lemonade@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 3f2cf88677bfbdeff30feb2c80e2257d
Subject: [lemonade] Proposed OMA liaison
X-BeenThere: lemonade@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service enivronments <lemonade.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:lemonade@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1655139086=="
Errors-To: lemonade-bounces@ietf.org
Folks, Attached below is the proposed liaison text to OMA as I discussed in the LEMONADE meeting yesterday. Please send any comments by the end of this week. Cheers, Glenn. ======================================================= From: IETF LEMONADE Working Group To: OMA MWG MEM Sub Working Group Date: April 1, 2007 Title: Update on LEMONADE activity Response contact: lemonade@ietf.org Purpose: For Action The IETF LEMONADE working group (WG) would like to update you on our progress. Of note is that we have several RFCs that have already been approved and published: RFC 4467 - IMAP URLAUTH RFC 4468 - IMAP BURL RFC 4469 - IMAP CATENATE RFC 4550 - LEMONADE Profile RFC 4551 - IMAP CONDSTORE RFC 4731 - IMAP ESEARCH In addition, the following documents are essentially complete and are complete and in the process of formal approval and publication: draft-vaudreuil-futuredelivery draft-ietf-lemonade-search-within draft-ietf-lemonade-deployments draft-ietf-lemonade-compress draft-ietf-lemonade-reconnect-client In addition, we are nearing completion on the rest of the documents in discussion in the WG. This includes CONVERT, notifications and finally LEMONADE Profile-bis. It is our intention that this work will conclude by June 2007. In the LEMONADE Notifications document (draft-ietf-lemonade-notifications) we have currently based 'out of band' notification on OMA EMN. However, in the development of the functionality we have the need to identify items (such as message subject, date, sender, etc.) that are not part of the EMN mechanism. As a result, we have described these as a different extended notification payload in addition to the base EMN payload. OMA MEM indicated that you were working with OMA BAC Push to validate our current approach and to extend EMN with these capabilities. We would appreciate a status on this activity. For the IMAP CONVERT protocol, the LEMONADE WG had agreed that the only 'Mandatory to Implement' conversion that will appear in the CONVERT protocol is HTML to TEXT. However, as we indicated previously the protocol itself can support any subset or even the entire OMA STI parameter suite. However, we do not believe that support of the full list of OMA STI parameters is appropriate. The LEMONADE profile will not specifify this list and OMA MEM indicated that you would further subset the full list of STI parameters to make it realistic for the OMA mobile enabler. We would appreciate a status on this activity. As we had previously indicated, LEMONADE has conducted a preliminary interoperability event. Note that from an IETF perspective, our interest is only to facilitate protocol maturity. Specifically, that is to prove the feasibility of the protocol (which we have done with our preliminary event) and to document multiple interworking implementations to prove maturity (which we will do later this year). At our preliminary event nine entities participated with four test LEMONADE servers and numerous clients. The group tested these implementations against the LEMONADE Profile (RFC 4550) and identified some clarifications that were needed to make the specifications clear. The specific issues of the interop event have been used to update our documents. We expect that we will have another event later this year based on the published Profile-bis. OMA MEM had indicated that the latter would be of interest to OMA IOP. Finally, as you know, the LEMONADE WG is working on a set of extensions to IMAP and ESMTP to support mobile email. This set will be succinctly described in the LEMONADE profile (draft-ietf-lemonade-profile-bis). We understand that the OMA TS will normatively reference the LEMONADE profile for the MEM protocol. In order to help us understand your usage better, we would appreciate a presentation on the OMA MEM TS for LEMONADE. Would it be possible to have such a presentation at our next meeting? Up-to-date information on LEMONADE Internet-Drafts and RFCs can always be found at http://tools.ietf.org/wg/lemonade/ with additional information on our charter page http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/lemonade-charter.html Finally, as information, the next meetings of the IETF LEMONADE WG are: - May ? - LEMONADE interim - TBD - July 22-27 - IETF 69 plenary - Chicago
_______________________________________________ lemonade mailing list lemonade@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade Supplemental Web Site: http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/lemonade
- [lemonade] Proposed OMA liaison Glenn Parsons
- Re: [lemonade] Proposed OMA liaison Randall Gellens
- Re: [lemonade] Proposed OMA liaison Dave Cridland