RE: [lemonade] WG last call on Goals - comments
"Weingarten Jerry" <Jerry.Weingarten@comverse.com> Thu, 21 October 2004 11:37 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA05124 for <lemonade-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:37:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKbSn-0005Id-2u for lemonade-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:50:37 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CKUJx-0006n6-6Q; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:13:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CKJeE-0006ji-Go for lemonade@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:49:14 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA24118 for <lemonade@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:49:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from il-tlv-smtpgateway.comverse.com ([192.118.48.242] helo=il-tlv-smtpout1.icomverse.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKJqX-0005G0-6G for lemonade@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:02:01 -0400
Received: from il-tlv-bridge01.comverse.com (il-tlv-bridge01.comverse.com [10.115.242.136]) by il-tlv-smtpout1.icomverse.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9KGRXqw009168 for <lemonade@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:27:33 +0200
Received: from il-tlv-mail01.comverse.com ([10.115.242.87]) by il-tlv-bridge01.comverse.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:48:56 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: [lemonade] WG last call on Goals - comments
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:48:56 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <045FA14A4C4F904BA2D5BEDC37E16AF8F2C01C@il-tlv-mail01.comverse.com>
Thread-Topic: [lemonade] WG last call on Goals - comments
Thread-Index: AcS1y4WK83wClCUMSp6Mzm8wCY7DYgA8wKMA
From: Weingarten Jerry <Jerry.Weingarten@comverse.com>
To: lemonade@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Oct 2004 16:48:56.0969 (UTC) FILETIME=[B0D32790:01C4B6C4]
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: a4e5f67c5e230eddf754446d1a2201a4
X-BeenThere: lemonade@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service enivronments <lemonade.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:lemonade@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1790684663=="
Sender: lemonade-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: lemonade-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 2d133cc328f58695161c98bb4f4dc213
Hi all, I have some comments on this document - mostly editorial but one or two requests for clarification - Editorial comments: Section 3.2.2 - First sentence should read - "Notification" is the transaction by which the server notifies ..., i.e. change the word "with" to "which"! Section 4 - Change the sentence - "A number of Internet mail profile supporting specific applications niches have been defined or proposed." (last sentence) should be changed to read "A number of Internet mail profile supporting specific application niches have been defined or proposed.", i.e. remove the 's' from "applications". Section 4.2.3 (second paragraph) - Change the first sentence where it states "...and reduce the amount of data that needs be transmitted ..." to read either "that needs to be" or "that need be". Section 5.6 (last sentence) - Change the sentence to read "Streaming between the server and client, in both directions, MUST BE supported", i.e. the "must be" should be capitalized, other correction for clarity of the text. Section 6.1.1.1 (second paragraph) - Change the phrase "or utiliizing an compnaion streaming protocol" to read "or utilizing a companion..." (i.e. drop the 'n') Questions for clarification - Section 5.2.1 - I don't know if this was ever discussed - however, another aspect of maintaining the context of the message would be (continuing the example that is given in this section) that if the recipient wishes to reply to the voice message then he should be limited to a format that the sender can access, in this case a voice message! Section 6.1 - This requirement seems to be limiting the requirement in section 5.1.1 and if this is the intention, why not just delete section 5.1.1 & 5.1.2? Section 6.1.1.1 - It was my understanding, from discussion in Vancouver, that the group felt that the IMAP Channel extension is no longer relevant. If this is the case shouldn't reference 38 and this example both here as well as in the next section be removed? Section 7.1.2 - I would say that most handsets (i.e. cellular phones) have a keyboard albeit a very limited one, but still a keyboard! Therefore, I would suggest to change the statement to be: "Most of them have either a very limited keyboard, no pointing device, or no screen navigation capability" Section 8.5 - The latest version of the 3GPP MMS Reference Architecture now defines ten interfaces! The question is whether there is a need to update this description or just limit it to the v5 of the Ref Arch? Yaacov (Jerry) Weingarten Comverse - Standards phone: +972-3-645 2392 mobile: +972-52-854 2392 email: jerry.weingarten@comverse.com -----Original Message----- From: Glenn Parsons [mailto:gparsons@nortelnetworks.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:16 PM To: 'lemonade@ietf.org' Subject: [lemonade] WG last call on Goals Folks, A two week last call period is open until midnight EDT Nov 2nd on: Goals for Internet Messaging to Support Diverse Service Environments <draft-ietf-lemonade-goals-04.txt> Please forward any comments on this document to the WG mailing list. Cheers, Glenn. ______________________________________________________________________ This email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-Secure and has been found clean.
_______________________________________________ lemonade mailing list lemonade@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade
- RE: [lemonade] WG last call on Goals - comments Weingarten Jerry
- RE: [lemonade] WG last call on Goals - comments Weingarten Jerry
- RE: [lemonade] WG last call on Goals - comments Kue Wong