IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lime] WG Last Call

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Mon, 27 June 2016 03:19 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CD212D5C2; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xR4vSOC8wF56; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA5A412D5D0; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4224; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1466997573; x=1468207173; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=nDMqg5SKO2u/8JiXhOITwG4B/uURFX3K/Y71vXNqG58=; b=TalmiAzfjs1LmbPtka9dDQFJ7JFYNa/957PSIlN22QUd7LaD9EeDrBhY Kmxd/wlY0yKQFsYWu8jj21H/Sx9mxi5zDvXzrFnzeq1JEH734jVDMcaCe altJvfHm7MR1tF3D3e+tqfsODRw/bM7dt50lb6u1JmHaRfc7VUzbv8mxi c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AaAgBJmnBX/5pdJa1cgz5WfQa1H4UBgXsXAQyFdAIcgQ44FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RNAQEEAQEBGgZLCxACAQgECjEDAgICJQsUEQEBBAENBYgwDq1qj3IBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYYogXcIgk6HQSuCLwWTTYU0AYYHiC+BaYRUiGePfgEeNoNwbgEBAYhWfwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,535,1459814400"; d="scan'208,217";a="122126469"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Jun 2016 03:19:32 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-016.cisco.com (xch-rtp-016.cisco.com [64.101.220.156]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u5R3JW6u013456 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:19:32 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-016.cisco.com (64.101.220.156) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:19:31 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:19:31 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lime] WG Last Call
Thread-Index: AdHNeHo9mfLLAhikTCqAkzKOu/b2GQCy8SIA
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:19:31 +0000
Message-ID: <2581A426-8BAD-4944-AD0F-1A5EA6DEF418@cisco.com>
References: <BLUPR0501MB2051737D8381B2F9B322F5EEAE2D0@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR0501MB2051737D8381B2F9B322F5EEAE2D0@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.215.66]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2581A4268BAD4944AD0F1A5EA6DEF418ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/4HsoVpXJJftNaVIRWne5VTJVLZE>
Cc: "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lime] WG Last Call
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:19:35 -0000

Hi, Authors of draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-06,

Please note that there are a number of nits that idnits is flagging on this draft. Specifically, missing and unused references, too long lines, etc:
https://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-06.txt

Please fix these nits as part of the WGLC comments.

Thanks!

— Carlos.


On Jun 23, 2016, at 1:56 PM, Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net>> wrote:

Folks,

This message begins a WG last call for draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-06. Last call ends on July 7, 2016.

                                 Ron

_______________________________________________
Lime mailing list
Lime@ietf.org<mailto:Lime@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email