Re: [Lime] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-09.txt

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Thu, 23 March 2017 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F171297CA for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eJH1r0rj08eJ for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x232.google.com (mail-ot0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9D5D1294CF for <lime@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x232.google.com with SMTP id i1so188917829ota.3 for <lime@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3dw4sMfP3jWYf7/+oUS0HvsJXIQtP90o2yHKARge+mc=; b=ji9uvLYcjsMpIZkeTX8Nx7gBF/JaEGAJcA7OYqzrlWFH3NlsO6GSg9ot+hlEo7Yns0 2xzZvMkc3mnIOUNIBi286s3nbT8GvAULj+zMR4F87l61rXSNbAeYKQ+a6PEehHE/WHZO bQq0KRFkB8XS2732uVgICrTWakVXZlRCyds0rl8Zf9fbZP0E25+uaho0Uqd/f3lTa7AE qdnLw/Brbx43FVAiTjWVBrl9o9BEL3uNQua5NJMIfARkkGCNRf2LLBAyXT+NCUDs3wCX iv16QHU8/jGPSEEVsXYkfVRY6EBFQlyg6jh4fjDdfqmRCgmP4kst8vKEv+QjrV+00em4 pUCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3dw4sMfP3jWYf7/+oUS0HvsJXIQtP90o2yHKARge+mc=; b=jPwU3B4WU6wdO/UHsHjK3/9rUdQFpSC4W+8/eRv3+AJGZKKNAu9CZUS9tkVHNP+Tjl q4pyBD0wPbYi2eczrbUIZP6cDkISuYYSBHECAyhGb1sM5dxSEtXhym+AIfbpstBJlh9S 1arZDXR7rsNCF57hDi474zaVxaGqqPFbcDHUOVHOKuO8/89++EyTAMnjb5Vz8JKihSKA kjHK6c9wOvuCHijQ4icIVkN5GIqhv9wuLIhO2z34glEDGYA3w5401xKg2GUbZlVTdIIS xVakU+ZkyYlRarGZ+egSJnTIWZNBW/Nb7mHoEm4OwniojV/IB07wB5IFVm6WfYOIs2d/ HqsQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0lH6ma16Wb77TQGuth6pRcyWzxI4ZoOH7s5pQ8RCfVzvGFCvn6cq4cJgI72V8Pqba22U8wjoew2dSpgQ==
X-Received: by 10.157.56.137 with SMTP id p9mr1732477otc.68.1490280721280; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.21.21 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E6BC9BBCBCACC246846FC685F9FF41EA2AD936F4@DGGEMM506-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <148885324406.15113.13594012235698646311.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E6BC9BBCBCACC246846FC685F9FF41EA2AD936F4@DGGEMM506-MBS.china.huawei.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:52:00 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXOYnV-+9q3o8RaAbHDj4dk0HghvJtU2FqzOAidHfYkvg@mail.gmail.com>
To: wangzitao <wangzitao@huawei.com>
Cc: "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c10e5e01fb3e054b6705fc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/SAvLmOeIdfjH6vw0OoxoK1HW0jw>
Subject: Re: [Lime] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-09.txt
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:52:09 -0000

Dear Authors, WG Chairs, et. al,
please consider my comments to the latest version of the CO OAM YANG model:

   - "remote RDI" is repetitive as RDI stands for Remote Defect Indication.
   - I encourage to clearly separate Continuity Check from Connectivity
   Verification. As I read from the draft, it does not address proactive OAM
   but only on-demand OAM (I'll comment on my view how these are different
   below). Thus I'll point that on-demand OAM cannot serve as Continuity
   Verification OAM since Mis-connection Defect cannot be determined based on
   on-demand OAM.
   - I propose the following definitions for proactive and on-demand OAM:
      - proactive OAM method requires persistent configuration
      - on-demand OAM method requires only transient configuration
   - document refers to globally unique Source MEP ID but has no example,
   nor explanation how one is constructed.
   - Maintenance Domain contains two md-levels - one of its own and one in
   MIP.
   - not clear why model explicitly refers to mpls-ttl out of all MPLS(-TP)
   - continuity-check RPC does not use md-level
   - traceroute RPC does not use md-level

Regards,
Greg

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 8:23 PM, wangzitao <wangzitao@huawei.com> wrote:

> Dear WG,
>
> According to the WGLC discussions, we update the Connection Oriented OAM
> YANG document.
> Thanks AdrIan Farrel, Greg Mirsky and others’ review and comments.
> In this version, we fix some nits, address the issues raised in email
> discussion,
> and add a MIP list in CO model. More details please see the draft.
>
> Best Regards!
> -Michael
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Lime [mailto:lime-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 internet-drafts@ietf.org
> 发送时间: 2017年3月7日 10:21
> 收件人: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> 抄送: lime@ietf.org
> 主题: [Lime] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-09.txt
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Layer Independent OAM Management in the
> Multi-Layer Environment of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Generic YANG Data Model for Connection Oriented
> Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols
>         Authors         : Deepak Kumar
>                           Qin Wu
>                           Michael Wang
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-09.txt
>         Pages           : 52
>         Date            : 2017-03-06
>
> Abstract:
>    This document presents a base YANG Data model for connection oriented
>    OAM protocols.  It provides a technology-independent abstraction of
>    key OAM constructs for such protocols.  The model presented here can
>    be extended to include technology specific details.  This guarantees
>    uniformity in the management of OAM protocols and provides support
>    for nested OAM workflows (i.e., performing OAM functions at different
>    levels through a unified interface)
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-09
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-09
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
> tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lime mailing list
> Lime@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime
> _______________________________________________
> Lime mailing list
> Lime@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime
>