IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lime] I-D Action: draft-wang-lime-yang-pm-00.txt

wangzitao <wangzitao@huawei.com> Mon, 13 July 2015 07:02 UTC

Return-Path: <wangzitao@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185A81AD0C3 for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.422
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.422 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TYxcY5kK4_sF for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 724521AD0C2 for <lime@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BVC28857; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 07:02:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEML428-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.183) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:01:59 +0100
Received: from SZXEML501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.165]) by szxeml428-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.183]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:01:24 +0800
From: wangzitao <wangzitao@huawei.com>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "Zhuangyan (Yan)" <zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com>, "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-wang-lime-yang-pm-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHQqofTxNn0gmS3VUOremdTDHsatJ2zu0WggAYpn1CAATNqoIAdyURQgAA8f7A=
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 07:01:24 +0000
Message-ID: <E6BC9BBCBCACC246846FC685F9FF41EAC2AAC1@szxeml501-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA84760CFA@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <9B4BC45FDEDDD84F813E9E4A5BAF87856AB4F2F5@nkgeml503-mbx.china.huawei.com> <E6BC9BBCBCACC246846FC685F9FF41EAC1FD70@szxeml501-mbx.china.huawei.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA847B02A5@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA847B02A5@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.62]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/Z4VCpuEIn6lcyNIzPBzZ9SjnW-k>
Cc: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Lime] I-D Action: draft-wang-lime-yang-pm-00.txt
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 07:02:04 -0000


-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Qin Wu 
发送时间: 2015年7月13日 11:29
收件人: wangzitao; Zhuangyan (Yan); lime@ietf.org
抄送: Tom Taylor
主题: RE: I-D Action: draft-wang-lime-yang-pm-00.txt

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: wangzitao 
发送时间: 2015年6月24日 12:34
收件人: Zhuangyan (Yan); Qin Wu; lime@ietf.org
抄送: Tom Taylor
主题: RE: I-D Action: draft-wang-lime-yang-pm-00.txt

Yes, for synthetic loss measurement, the loss-responder parameter support synthetic loss measurement. 
And there is a container: measurement-type including a SLM leaf, it can be used to indicate what type of loss measurement will perform.
 
For dual-ended, I think you are right, it can support the dual-ended as well.
The dual-ended allow each local device to calculate the loss on the remote device. 

[Qin]: Agree.

And in gen-oam-pm model, the measurement-type is a container, which allows easy extension. You can augment it with dual-ended node such as:

augment ”/goam:domains/goam:domain"
+"/goam:MAs/goam:MA/goam:MEP/goampm:loss-measurement"
+"/goampm:measurement-type"{
 leaf dual-ended{
 type boolean;
 }
}
[Qin]:I think the best way to support dual-ended is to define dual-ended-responder parameter and put it under MEP as follows:
    augment "/goam:domains/goam:domain"
      +"/goam:MAs/goam:MA/goam:MEP" {
        leaf dual-ended-delay-responder {
         type boolean;
         }

[Michael]: yes. It is an another solution and it can simplify the augment target path.

Best Regards!
-Michael



-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Lime [mailto:lime-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Zhuangyan (Yan)
发送时间: 2015年6月23日 18:35
收件人: Qin Wu; lime@ietf.org
抄送: Tom Taylor
主题: Re: [Lime] I-D Action: draft-wang-lime-yang-pm-00.txt

Dear authors,

I support this draft. But I have two comments when reading it.
In draft-wang-lime-yang-pm-00, loss measurement is supported. Hence, I am wondering if the loss-repsonder parameter can be enabled to support synthetic loss measurement.
In addition, single ended responder is supported, can I assume dual-ended responder can also be supported as well?

Many thanks.

Regards,

Yan

_______________________________________________
Lime mailing list
Lime@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email