IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Status of "profile" and IANA Link Relations list

Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> Wed, 20 February 2013 08:01 UTC

Return-Path: <dret@berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36BD821F89B5 for <link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:01:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ujKbxYp7iJxr for <link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:01:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cm06fe.IST.Berkeley.EDU (cm06fe.IST.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.218.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31A321F893E for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:01:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 46-126-158-51.dynamic.hispeed.ch ([46.126.158.51] helo=dretpro.local) by cm06fe.ist.berkeley.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (auth plain:dret@berkeley.edu) (envelope-from <dret@berkeley.edu>) id 1U84cK-00032u-Jg; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:01:29 -0800
Message-ID: <512482D3.5020908@berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:01:23 +0100
From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Status of "profile" and IANA Link Relations list
References: <CAPW_8m7LarF5seM1UkKyR8wddb9cu+2r+4m-+xeihh+ExHTr8w@mail.gmail.com> <A389CE3C95EA4A35A797C937F91B8A1A@gmail.com> <CAPW_8m6SqjH1qdGJy=ZyFq3weWE7N8veKDj_mhxiX3-MHVZzPg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPW_8m6SqjH1qdGJy=ZyFq3weWE7N8veKDj_mhxiX3-MHVZzPg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: link-relations <link-relations@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:01:30 -0000

hello mike.

On 2013-02-19 22:56 , mike amundsen wrote:
> yep, already listed. sorry for missing that.
> still interested in RFC progress.

hard to tell. it has been sitting in the RFC editor queue [1] for a 
while, and afaict, getting out of this queue is an indeterministic 
process, simply based on workload and capacity of the RFC editor. i have 
no idea how long it is going to take until RFChood is achieved, but i 
hope it is not going to be more than a couple of weeks. fwiw, i had 
completed working on this draft mid-october, and since then it has been 
moving along according to the process.

cheers,

dret.

[1] http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email