IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: canonical

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 17 February 2011 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD5F3A6E11 for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:39:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.644
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.644 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.045, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wA9gVh-0xLGB for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:39:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C04F3A6E08 for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:39:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2011 13:40:04 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.134]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 14:40:04 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+VZ2lDo6WV6xWMZz0fDu7GVV1OapuiJHexfAhdry cItiTIUKISOJgR
Message-ID: <4D5D252B.1080107@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:39:55 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
References: <AANLkTi=gB=M+gM5JheX1pcNrdvgsiCzT6qi9zaYyL5X=@mail.gmail.com> <9F2D0C6E-340B-4505-A506-6340E203CBF4@mnot.net> <4D5BE9B3.9060703@gmx.de> <AANLkTimrtYa0AsAS4bKokLRqquF3v=BTUn=3qb5KH4U-@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimrtYa0AsAS4bKokLRqquF3v=BTUn=3qb5KH4U-@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: sj@google.com, link-relations@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: canonical
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:39:35 -0000

On 17.02.2011 14:32, Ed Summers wrote:
> ...
> Julian, Mark would Sam's draft need to be an RFC before we could link
> to it from the registry? I guess a similar hosted at google.com would
> work as well?
> ...

 From IETF's point of view, IDs are volatile documents that disappear 
when they expire. So no, this wouldn't be sufficient.

Hosting a document at google.com should work if the URI looks stable.

Optimally, we'd just finish the Internet Draft and get it published...

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email