Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of document draft-portoles-lisp-eid-mobility-02.txt

Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 12 April 2017 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6837312EAAD; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ek-GSm8qaaHV; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x236.google.com (mail-wr0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 255FA12EAB9; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x236.google.com with SMTP id o21so20246892wrb.2; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=otc61OANApCHYJxMCahTgl9EURZ5+wSsUC9E4PsrlIo=; b=EeYWkQl/pfrSlORy2C2vEoSYSnTRtzWZtasvOhEw6GA9/iCDvNkQA+X26MM8OWGvxC dRPP8C3zRAWfJH+JQLKKmmv4Lnev8K3sTsNGUrs0u3Xi300kVdzq4Wt3Vkd+Phnl8Pey k8hxJSUJcOLhdbCuKOFYEfSjZvON9WUWBMsFRs5CIEkEWeUGfkWVLBiAuyoJzMMLEJpG KhwX1/j2X63RQ7/sEPs8g2+MNtTYNO9s8a/rk9S2rq3nv+07KAkbMNzu9Vxd4HzDJIwt 8GUgExKkt+C+98Tiw7e23PxZW7hjh+hDkSAZOkZjZocCDT+Gb3pXq0HuPkJcIasma1jy 2X1w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=otc61OANApCHYJxMCahTgl9EURZ5+wSsUC9E4PsrlIo=; b=FUKLbW+ImCA4RoAZ2/7t0buDBK8UTbfgO94hGbjYRnHBLVNWFZmLlMfWr5VI9I/xRT Ew5/xZ15JVtar9MnJHR7QUoNXwRHfXKpnm3VO+ZpTDo/PiRAw18Kj9OuDwAG71OMx4uL tYqZUrpCA79/6wXCF5ydtpXkfUNYD+/+m4OSD04eGD6nmIlRDA5h38YmBcy4Jd5sglHJ WjlmesCd029Hb9ZyqCvM76oqYCeZy5/uYSXNs0ERJkWguV3rT8P77swIWK3h14GU8/15 8vCbrFM1ZLrDds0ow8W3I03whvAu6UQUclt2KiWUXzAhsvq9e4jp8f0vDrd7s1MD0oZm WZHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7ovwybGiUyBcjELPE+UHoJkXTownodlr3nPBMiwH9qgGQjWKGQp3InhTjIAHMNBvGQBWWpu2DXEKlHQQ==
X-Received: by 10.223.175.81 with SMTP id z75mr3613738wrc.11.1492012213746; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.170.76 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <29634658-E437-4E0E-9787-71D2CD0D8B01@gigix.net>
References: <29634658-E437-4E0E-9787-71D2CD0D8B01@gigix.net>
From: Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:50:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG-CQxp07r_wqKEx0xdFn-035wvKOqsxJ0xG_tVeuADDea4g+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045d5538006300054cfa2a68"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/2ob-33xynzD5wQ_5nCqdl9W3zBo>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of document draft-portoles-lisp-eid-mobility-02.txt
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:50:30 -0000

Support

Padma

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> During the 98th IETF authors of the document draft-portoles-lisp-
> eid-mobility-02.txt
> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-portoles-lisp-eid-mobility-02]
> asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on
> adoption.
>
> This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the
> meeting outcome.
> The call ends on  April 27th 2017.
>
> Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of approval or
> disapproval.
>
> Recall that:
>
> - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is
> expected to
>   modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the
> content is solid.
>   Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see
> changes to its content.
>
> - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state your
> reasons why,
>   and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
>
> - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues and
> we can
>   begin a dialog about how best to address them.
>
>
>
> Luigi and Joel
>