IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis-02: (with COMMENT)

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Wed, 23 January 2019 03:33 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4904130E0A; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 19:33:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KZN7Yj_egt44; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 19:33:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com (mail-pl1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5FE0130DFA; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 19:33:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id w4so426397plz.1; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 19:33:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=8ib3fjW64ofYwjPikEUJ6axBccA4XFpU+CHDEemj2nY=; b=hF6Ef8nIQqsat5LIWzBPA2wp8jTK9mhRsBTDwePYTsjACIJwiR9ARW1QXrvaM/ljBt rUnwLXqLa6388NgEgv0jieCJIfvZh2k+M1uML+7wIZSqtKF4kd5ka9uGpGrl4jSNlRzj eHjtGk72wYcml6lEx/hE+d0qmFlut5hTYp0GPr3YQMFlOnTZErD/kM24sYWJmcYI0+uc x8WG6W/byORrOh7VfikGCQpESKYqKvdbme4G6ldvPFj43zzH53jOWW7vMyMEnFJpykAi lKHsoaT69jnsh597tmSNFcyLI4W6zz2tHzetA03pPc93Qnzfvv6U63McTigBCgh5bIZ8 d9tg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=8ib3fjW64ofYwjPikEUJ6axBccA4XFpU+CHDEemj2nY=; b=tSUPiuDCgcauYqiNRisRA3N5XFJd2BsQ/lRTA/TourMIfkySMRN9ZH4dXmBXcTs/9/ rrUCJ3UY2q97itOymqUhle+CTmgyqYwD/cueAXn0sT+7bBKDgMT4Y6MVG44PCZ7eySSc xmgNn5A89Ads/tWqc+hNZRQpaqdTEZGsNgfuMLAQX7itCqYu3dKW+lRSh/64uXI7ZHxj F4oxOoCeY1e6w12zL9HFcRRWZTUSZzQZXPE5NvqVELlbmLnQL+E5bCb/SpnHPISsroAT gi3ENOzAKnm3U3/JBJ5vkIUFh2lt7ILOtOc49JqZzO7X5t3YD4frSUHykyXKNsFtoKu/ dqmA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfAG6Tt020hp1Ttj9CBA9XGcilI2YxXsho7EJF7oH8xrCKn9Cv3 UzPHErG0pAcjHeCvNijwY09wNv5a
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4fZeLxLIubSo7ofD0ALb5JmR7w3lTeBmDRtv58BLpT0p3Lj5BDgWIbvXCnMsxlpBLo3sWKcw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:541:: with SMTP id 59mr626391plf.88.1548214429043; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 19:33:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:9600:e494:581e:5cb2:7c1:f061? ([2601:646:9600:e494:581e:5cb2:7c1:f061]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e24sm20990576pfi.153.2019.01.22.19.33.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 19:33:48 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16C101)
In-Reply-To: <154821409786.13299.9303439513607071289.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 19:33:47 -0800
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B8E11164-BE13-4EFE-B7BE-C3D2642C9C14@gmail.com>
References: <154821409786.13299.9303439513607071289.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/4AIwi1ssargb3vJd9YVv0Vjwr9M>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 03:33:52 -0000

Regarding your comment on 6833bis, we are waiting to hear from the reviewers if the  many updates we made are satisfactory. 

Dino

> On Jan 22, 2019, at 7:28 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis-02: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> §4:  Is 6833bis likely to progress soon? Is their risk of changes there that
> might invalidate this statement?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email