IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Lisp for 5G

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Sun, 28 August 2016 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D208512D18F for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 06:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id znYSVMxC8PDW for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 06:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x235.google.com (mail-qt0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8367C12D186 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 06:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x235.google.com with SMTP id w38so57580801qtb.0 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 06:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=jol9/Wv6easkXV5CR+F71ohLigG4o6jYeancXLpaYA4=; b=dMkH5EisTuam+6ECYIubqE3amF5NdjXIulO/YerH4bsD0UksbI/H5OKS6p+DQeEFEh ZNvrpXriOz0xVcMIUYD3aDNpmAEgJLSy/x3Q26HnAv+rR2Rh+2MZm6L3OGOUS7j3XOZ0 qgkGOtbyILl+/Fn+qvYaHsOA4NcHerreztaLsgoyunMnalfEEhYw3jtzZMQg7wIIaHnZ n6e7f9BKh139hFssnRne0uoPmruQeGxmax0noYz6QsN2GRZRVom/jhxBqX473DS8s/Rw rSAY/go991N6y6wPba4rb/uAfMAkr03i30zy5BxQJhy4EuPoNxgnuSjR+/Arbmtg/7Qm DP6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=jol9/Wv6easkXV5CR+F71ohLigG4o6jYeancXLpaYA4=; b=DT0voYNgiKQ8f/BIYQt4BRh7fQb1T3LAQJixwMDAsp+2HuGhUREFTXc6x9Ngh1Q12p ayAm+kLF8wUxY8mv537N/2Ei8Ia2c1nj6/ehU4zU0dyUwqzOMfLw4mBhJbPX/Uby60/R HHZ83LCQ4oCB2Tah6EBuqh/srq5uHBsorS6pojGGqWE3xF3TBeyDMrK2XfMJ00Lncuno +A0ALB3zj9uZxqnztaZlWAolX+SfTkBCwlezRgB+SQGBTmpETZfO07s9o0iRWrL4NamE YsSgmwvRu66EZFPWYeCF1BHkj0mVzuPlUGy6UgsmTYs/OcFcyxfS0DGWyFyEgBVeAsZ+ qWTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOIbXzlUs9ywwLMSgEfod8W6GSqsmja+1dsqlbUfffqPKg2k44Ky3vnYiJT5veZ6w==
X-Received: by 10.237.37.58 with SMTP id v55mr13548772qtc.9.1472389894680; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 06:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.156] (96-83-121-173-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [96.83.121.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f62sm15630386qka.3.2016.08.28.06.11.34 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 28 Aug 2016 06:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D6F95AA7-64DF-4418-BB48-B56A512C686F@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 06:11:38 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4D4F4BB5-01A5-4CCA-80F5-EABB38CACC76@gmail.com>
References: <099C4B79-7704-46C1-8964-844C5D093E9B@gmail.com> <9CCD7FDA-A935-4245-AD71-ADB1707C3727@gmail.com> <D6F95AA7-64DF-4418-BB48-B56A512C686F@gmail.com>
To: Sharon Barkai <sbarkai@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/4NeqWmbG6ktQbCr5vjikTopMQ7w>
Cc: lisp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lisp] Lisp for 5G
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 13:11:37 -0000

> Maybe we should go in a draft through all the mechanisms, multi home, bits, Smr ..
> specifically in the context of handover 
> Perhaps a heads up message from the mobile device  is needed before fully  moving from ETR to ETR …

Some of this is already in the draft-portoles-lisp-eid-mobility draft. Please have a look at it and give us detailed comments about what you see is missing. And we will add.

Maybe this is a good time to ask the working group to have a detailed look at draft-portoles-lisp-eid-mobility since other working groups are looking at LISP to solve the mobility problem (as well as SDOs like 3GPP and ETSI).

So comments are welcome!!!

Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email