[lisp] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-23: (with COMMENT)
Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 04 February 2019 17:10 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F6F130ED4; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 09:10:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis@ietf.org, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.91.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154930025720.28654.6669816175211800214.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 09:10:57 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/4wa1stjxha0C7gpJ2uIMzVe1_4k>
Subject: [lisp] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-23: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 17:11:03 -0000
Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-23: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) s/rfc8113/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis (2) §5.1: "Values in the "Not Assigned" range can be assigned according to procedures in [RFC8126]." This sentence is out of place because it doesn't specify which procedure...and the action is already specified in rfc8113bis anyway. (3) s/Not assigned/Unassigned To match what the registry says.
- [lisp] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [lisp] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-… BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [lisp] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-… BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [lisp] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-… Dino Farinacci