[lisp] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-23: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 04 February 2019 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F6F130ED4; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 09:10:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis@ietf.org, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.91.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154930025720.28654.6669816175211800214.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 09:10:57 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/4wa1stjxha0C7gpJ2uIMzVe1_4k>
Subject: [lisp] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-23: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 17:11:03 -0000

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-23: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) s/rfc8113/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis

(2) §5.1: "Values in the "Not Assigned" range can be assigned according to
procedures in [RFC8126]."  This sentence is out of place because it doesn't
specify which procedure...and the action is already specified in rfc8113bis
anyway.

(3) s/Not assigned/Unassigned     To match what the registry says.