IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-boucadair-lisp-type-iana-01

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Fri, 15 July 2016 11:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD3912D770 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 04:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8xVVr22n70oj for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 04:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB99A12D583 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 04:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id f65so23084868wmi.0 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 04:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=TibZEBRMMYH3d/Ev7WTxnlc3OYTLS2Tsg4BIHJk3dT4=; b=eUbsglz5ucQ8J1qEB6k48DUn0e7DAHCCU06Nd+Rm8eo2lgU+te0BWrIJdZ7phsDQZi 3dHQLuk+UdFnOlz4DsxhPhvTQYKwMOBwIhzMyV0iEadd9lGcgzDOYwLUrjczrA5GJWOf WOZZUJnbmohsb4TESp7PlGHKqwlgWqWchsx4JSkqwBo7QmC7YjUii6jx1lwHWT0TpF+e OYC9xAJouxwoS4+VUdGMOxD0KOXVdn1o0UuGEYvKHqDj4M4Z24PlcJ6gbB+MRck1G82D U6v5Zd0W0m0LKgvN73cDSrpC3Nhdn+yVdwsob+ZDVDjSQRFst6Vfh5gcw6Wu0er8ePUw 9pWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=TibZEBRMMYH3d/Ev7WTxnlc3OYTLS2Tsg4BIHJk3dT4=; b=WE+mFjfVGgChK2xdjqaqRjibxaKlZ2r/lLEyBh8pg+j8gHJI/wkm3HRsqCOMsM0O+e ezBZZ7HA+xSV81AN+QPak0P/7kgLq/zYqbIBGDhVivM60rEV50/qk7VRdQjM8Xbje2IA sBgJ/OFcdyQTw2XWs/uqdk0pUfqoJqNoVQG1aenvsBGsgb4pd4Mr9uCSTf8EWzzmk66s KvG6vqO9XRlkYGwkfhXqXuCgG61mpRpP3NsTeZStEZJLkkkJzbPusCaCXcK94Ngj5n4x ckIbWKzldkZk6urU2E0TfhVFBaJ8EZXJrIKrvge2MyZQRqrtfux6G1UjiyRw6rMHF9HA 2dCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLjFscZIBUqw6K2F4SRA3gyU7NqOaosju9zeu4nYDTxUqMKNRe/HGVqlDnCzFUjew==
X-Received: by 10.28.11.79 with SMTP id 76mr23394600wml.91.1468583702113; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 04:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:660:330f:a4:c4e5:50f0:1b17:7963? ([2001:660:330f:a4:c4e5:50f0:1b17:7963]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c2sm383597wjf.20.2016.07.15.04.54.59 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Jul 2016 04:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BE764EAF-3C82-4154-BBC3-6161B8B4A5FD"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <4A2C0466-F1E3-45B8-BDFC-9486DA6E9477@gigix.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 13:56:04 +0200
Message-Id: <9BDAB27E-54A0-430F-A907-ED6AF81A8A0E@gigix.net>
References: <4A2C0466-F1E3-45B8-BDFC-9486DA6E9477@gigix.net>
To: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/5hQKixyjW_AQu3GprFWtWs5dWfs>
Cc: Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-boucadair-lisp-type-iana-01
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:55:06 -0000

His All,

the chairs have review the WG discussion during the adoption call.  

We are concerned by the low level of support.  
We also observed significant discussion around the experimental allocation.  
So we are re-issuing and clarifying the call, to finish one week afte rthe end of IETF 96. 

Please comment on two separate issues:

1) Do you think we should create a registry for LISP message types

2) If yes to (1), do you think that registry should include reserving an entry for Experimentation?

As indicated in the first mail silence does not indicate support, please respond to the call.

Yours,

Joel
Luigi

On 28 Jun 2016, at 11:37, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> The chairs received a request for the following document to be
> adopted as a WG item:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-lisp-type-iana-01 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-lisp-type-iana-01>
> 
> Here starts a 14 day call for adoption, this call will end on
> Tuesday the 12th July, 2016.
> 
> Please email the WG list stating whether or not you support acceptance.
> 
> If you email to support the acceptance of this document as a WG item, please
> also indicate if you are able and willing to either contribute to, or review, (or both) the draft.
> 
> Sitting in silence does not indicate support, please respond appropriately.
> 
> 
> The Chairs
> Joel & Luigi
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email