IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] #5: LISP protocol version is alive and kicking

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Mon, 21 September 2009 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B217728C107 for <lisp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.33
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.33 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.065, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G8uai9nLEU1B for <lisp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED2A3A6B2A for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 2F3B7413B; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:34:31 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com>
References: <20090921174923.CC40B6BE54F@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <C0ACCB7B60E6F14B9AC46D742C1009A15D0B8F@xmb-sjc-213.amer.cisco.com> <tslocp4aszk.fsf@mit.edu> <C0ACCB7B60E6F14B9AC46D742C1009A15D0C0E@xmb-sjc-213.amer.cisco.com>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:34:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <C0ACCB7B60E6F14B9AC46D742C1009A15D0C0E@xmb-sjc-213.amer.cisco.com> (Darrel Lewis's message of "Mon\, 21 Sep 2009 15\:25\:06 -0700")
Message-ID: <tslocp49bbc.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>, lisp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lisp] #5: LISP protocol version is alive and kicking
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:33:31 -0000

>>>>> "Darrel" == Darrel Lewis (darlewis) <darlewis@cisco.com> writes:


    Darrel> So Protocol mechanisms (of the various proposals we've
    Darrel> been discussing) for versioning have the same result as
    Darrel> the TTL method.

    Darrel> Hope that clears things up.

Not really.  I'm still very confused how this has to do with
versioning of what data encapsulation I use between two XTRs, which is
what we were discussing here.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email