Re: [lisp] [rrg] LISP-NERD-Map-Resolver ~= APT & Ivip
Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com> Tue, 10 March 2009 05:57 UTC
Return-Path: <dino@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D163A6A0A for <lisp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dV-HbcP5qdEn for <lisp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C5D3A6A37 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,334,1233532800"; d="scan'208";a="264441808"
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2009 05:58:03 +0000
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n2A5w3Io012393; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:58:03 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2A5w3xZ017485; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 05:58:03 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:58:03 -0700
Received: from [192.168.1.5] ([10.21.122.184]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:58:03 -0700
Message-Id: <CCD49129-EBEC-435F-9181-42A62773FDC2@cisco.com>
From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
To: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <49B5DF43.7090401@firstpr.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:58:03 -0700
References: <49B5DF43.7090401@firstpr.com.au>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Mar 2009 05:58:03.0124 (UTC) FILETIME=[2CAED340:01C9A145]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=783; t=1236664683; x=1237528683; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dino@cisco.com; z=From:=20Dino=20Farinacci=20<dino@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[rrg]=20LISP-NERD-Map-Resolver=20~=3D=2 0APT=20&=20Ivip |Sender:=20; bh=snICcIsqPrMqHeq9PH26oMTTQcKf3hweoxQedAz/5gc=; b=HUQ+3+rJ4h1srTEUSryUWW4I+LEpJlHtsw+97nSCBYfjvCVHRFHx1Joxfk +6E/LS5MwRa/zKaLxQDaaesyJGy0NxvwgvMRVCr6HhZC6m356EIaNSyVvxlP h8Vsg0ZfoN;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=dino@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
Cc: lisp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lisp] [rrg] LISP-NERD-Map-Resolver ~= APT & Ivip
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 05:57:29 -0000
Changing to lisp@ietf.org list. > Perhaps the LISP team is contemplating using NERD full push mapping > distribution to Map-Resolvers, instead of ALT or CONS. > > LISP Map Server (and Map-Resolvers) 2009-03-03 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fuller-lisp-ms-00 > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg/current/msg04575.html > > Dino wrote: "... a Map-Resolver can be a LISP-ALT > router/system, a NERD system, or a > CONS/DHT system." No, we are not contemplating. We are just saying that we *can* use any database mapping system. We still think the most robust, proven, and one with decent management tools is LISP-ALT. And the fact you can use off-the-shelf routers is a huge plus as well. Dino
- Re: [lisp] [rrg] LISP-NERD-Map-Resolver ~= APT & … Dino Farinacci