Re: [lisp] Moving forward with lisp-nexagon

"Victor Moreno (vimoreno)" <vimoreno@cisco.com> Mon, 17 August 2020 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <vimoreno@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC713A10E7; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=kzaUadXf; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=WVFIgLYW
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3yr6jRdx4IL2; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3EFF3A10E2; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=38807; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1597696574; x=1598906174; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=atis2rS+5u7pWjxJ2SbgyC/8nnmWd6IfB5mD0q73N18=; b=kzaUadXfzz8oHEjd+X9kKFDqoryOB+GdmaE0rLKkNIt8eeMuMAovjraH axmv7Ws6ZlL4jgwgSl6mwaA/MV09SAX54O67G3DscKRE9jDaKzro9om27 B5eEjTrPGh7q/aN5iEoTJQ6aEV7+/xByzp+mKZ37acoFXmbYA2L4kt3uT c=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:ClBbxhZU9ohQ/qHgpz2GMOr/LSx94ef9IxIV55w7irlHbqWk+dH4MVfC4el21QWVD4ne4uhPzevbr66mXnYPst6Ns3EHJZpLURJNycAbhBcpD8PND0rnZOXrYCo3EIUnNhdl8ni3PFITFJP4YFvf8XG35CQZXBTyKQQzIf76Scbeis2t3LW0/JveKwxDmDu6Z+Z0KxO75QXcv8Ubm81sMKE0nxDIuXBPPe9RwDBl
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A3CADH6Tpf/5pdJa1cAx0BAQEBCQESAQUFAYIKgVJRB3BYLywKhC2DRgONXJhpgUKBEQNVCwEBAQwBARgBDAgCBAEBhAhEAheCNgIkOBMCAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBgRthS8IJQyFcQEBAQMBAQEQER0BAQwgCwEECwIBCBEBAgECAQwUBwMCAgIlCgEUAwYIAgQOBR0EAYMEAYF+TQMOIAEOpTgCgTmIYXaBMoMBAQEFgTMBAwIOQYMrGIIOCYE4gnGDUQINhkwbgUE/gREnHIJNPoJcAQEBAQEBFYEICQESAQkXCBAJAQwRCYJQM4Itj2gGKoJrhmEmizePfXUKgmKIY5E9Ax6DAIEjiDmTRZx8kFBUg1gCBAIEBQIOAQEFgUAqI2dwcBUaISoBgj4JCisSFwINjSR7CQMFEoNOhRSFQQF0AgE0AgYBCQEBAwl8jyABgRABAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,324,1592870400"; d="scan'208,217";a="803786988"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 17 Aug 2020 20:36:12 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07HKaCtD018716 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:36:12 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:36:12 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:36:11 -0500
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:36:11 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=KULjblHRX6N+kergzI9GNpKaSIq0SOu9FL5XmY5f6bgHrUO0TlHWVcOw4qTO5eoczazXwHHQO27pTk9CD+FGPdLWjpP+ERSXUmeuFde5NIfNvQMa46o7dRglh+N6gCmNetbq9TYU5T3JKSOTTW4Yt42WS6O+NF0NvmYi9FPC9HSjaCWW+YhtIkaSJwh6fszsqZcqrMNHk2yFQxzt2mph+uDIRJm0M16hiftEf8Il3KP7LOWiuPrebopxTLNybD2ZVIVYGT4Pz7dXFehoFts17AeVK4EupPkPZhXBxQ4hiMl1xRp0q1H8vKIQS9AQvz1WqOBfsGrbNgjvqheGFf4Yxw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=atis2rS+5u7pWjxJ2SbgyC/8nnmWd6IfB5mD0q73N18=; b=cxltymam5qQ4cVuJ2qLplXB3i9VbxBxMfJjfZMf5u6FL/AFzJvh6M+DyMShMV56DeMPZBbJj3w/FTl/sPfRsC7+F0Ei6sY0hk1FhPvxHwO/lil2NCV4KkfUhrr8BlmuqnUIvaKDYNjJSYuHEblwJuH9PWcoZohf/j2lyg0kJ1WlZywWH6z/yG0tEwfMXc5BHVjHP7ETW/I+R16KalR2pfOZOIhORyFLZM4kbQrjAY9zHPT5jAUTNpXLTWr2rSjEVUobneHYul2THhzhk9/o9H1/0HHAJZEQoFLmYA/EsKy9Pv9BKnxih0rqhv7AhF01e09huTFsnVwBa/ywJwQirbw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=atis2rS+5u7pWjxJ2SbgyC/8nnmWd6IfB5mD0q73N18=; b=WVFIgLYWNKexnIc1Lahcz7KY8gQCsnFn8UuUm1UtkGq+WGyZfGtpnTYMVn/6P2ioS+JYslV8TLLRfe+7GOR5XzUjdqaREvIMm9QA8EPNUgdeQLjIisVVQjSBwRL9TL68BtLDlZCgyaPDFKfJ5sb17S80NWvdNgek2VwvFLQav7s=
Received: from BY5PR11MB4227.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:1c3::17) by BY5PR11MB4465.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:1c0::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3283.20; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:36:09 +0000
Received: from BY5PR11MB4227.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e883:e6c:55b5:6a85]) by BY5PR11MB4227.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e883:e6c:55b5:6a85%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3283.028; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:36:09 +0000
From: "Victor Moreno (vimoreno)" <vimoreno@cisco.com>
To: Sharon Barkai <sharon.barkai=40getnexar.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: Rotem Tamir <rotemtamir=40getnexar.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>, "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] Moving forward with lisp-nexagon
Thread-Index: AQHWaoZ7Bt6IvLV6bUmwbAyM7/jo36k6uw8AgAIb9gA=
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:36:09 +0000
Message-ID: <A1F2BD3B-43BA-4F0A-BE07-E93968B1DC97@cisco.com>
References: <mailman.348.1596554267.7280.lisp@ietf.org> <CALu8Y5YK3AHJy2FmdBuTD1J=uz_rsDy2AKoE1s=1jqUNtxbv0Q@mail.gmail.com> <9A02CEA7-0853-4006-AFD9-3AFE36D3E3DB@getnexar.com>
In-Reply-To: <9A02CEA7-0853-4006-AFD9-3AFE36D3E3DB@getnexar.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
authentication-results: dmarc.ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc.ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [128.107.241.161]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 18b96143-3570-4d59-2fd5-08d842ed2c96
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY5PR11MB4465:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY5PR11MB4465BFC607D91823A7BB5A19CB5F0@BY5PR11MB4465.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: tB1tgXvcjcrM9Gr1r2T+Q2bLLr+sxEIP1IGuENSQ6gMinl9PNVkap8xf7gqp8KyhofZCKAa/OWMgrxHgpp5qPgIB2HR53+KvX/9dzgl+rpR1vNGif5ZS8GjADkDbDnbRWJIEe5rVc5sEfLaWGL+lBoGd/eiS+HFJpXMM8X0ET47AN3w3sudlIOYL5oSRifhAB0layGnR0+eobapW3H13OXh3vEXS6yV6x2IAZdHfgMjmAMzgcr1hX86wHPQet7OeaBD51gvGjTvV64mbcbtidnKKcl9NJf03HwUo6OvnMFIpIupzruYQgAYKeUQ+01xuLpCTN0S86UCcm0uqqxxcC63LhQxu4I0LhRSPVbgrmcNja1M5y6MeBTqCeIP487d82iMcuJuWK2d1H1TL0kB1cQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BY5PR11MB4227.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(396003)(376002)(366004)(136003)(39860400002)(6506007)(53546011)(186003)(66574015)(36756003)(166002)(2906002)(83380400001)(6512007)(33656002)(2616005)(66946007)(8936002)(6486002)(478600001)(5660300002)(64756008)(66446008)(966005)(66556008)(66476007)(76116006)(8676002)(4326008)(86362001)(71200400001)(26005)(316002)(54906003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A1F2BD3B43BA4F0ABE07E93968B1DC97ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BY5PR11MB4227.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 18b96143-3570-4d59-2fd5-08d842ed2c96
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Aug 2020 20:36:09.4158 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: oxlCq4KHQW1FGBMagFmEew/b5sTzxxSRzDae3d0oEDaGhRzqFO2hUmnnHLb3kJDAKil5yoqnp27F+tIgMFOoHw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY5PR11MB4465
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/FicBOAicZAZgsJsgc1HMXCqYI60>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Moving forward with lisp-nexagon
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:36:18 -0000

You have my support as well.

-v


On Aug 16, 2020, at 5:23 AM, Sharon Barkai <sharon.barkai=40getnexar.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:sharon.barkai=40getnexar.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:

Thank you Rotem, Dino, Fabio, Alberto, and all other sent support notes.
I ask the chairs to move from adoption, steps following RFC are outlined bellow.

Understood the chairs would like lisp-nexagon to reference the 6830bis not rfc6830.
This makes sense, hopefully 6830bis will clear IESG soon. Tnx.




On Aug 4, 2020, at 20:40, Rotem Tamir <rotemtamir=40getnexar.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:rotemtamir=40getnexar.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:

Hi Sharon,

As a person coming from a non networking background, having worked on web backend and data pipeline problems for many years I wanted to say that working on this standard has been quite an eye opening experience.

I have not even heard of LISP before this work (when you first approached me with this I thought you were referring to the programming language), and I did struggle with the idea for a while. But looking at it now from an system architecture perspective it is a brilliantly simple and scalable approach to building a massive network of real-time geo spatial communication.

Had we not gone with this approach we would have created yet another version of the wheel, another proprietary  black box protocol.

These are very exciting times to be in the AI/vision/automotive field and I really think we have a solid foundation to build upon.

So yes, I join the others in saying  I’m really looking forward to it become a proper RFC,

Thanks for your work on this !!

R

On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 at 18:18 <lisp-request@ietf.org<mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org>> wrote:
Send lisp mailing list submissions to
        lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org>

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        lisp-request@ietf.org<mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org>

You can reach the person managing the list at
        lisp-owner@ietf.org<mailto:lisp-owner@ietf.org>

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of lisp digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-vpn-06.txt (internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>)
   2. Re: Moving forward with lisp-nexagon (Lori Jakab (lojakab))
   3. Re: Moving forward with lisp-nexagon (Fabio Maino (fmaino))


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 15:38:14 -0700
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org<mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>>
Cc: lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-vpn-06.txt
Message-ID: <159649429407.9381.18270622230431003594@ietfa.amsl.com<mailto:159649429407.9381.18270622230431003594@ietfa.amsl.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol WG of the IETF.

        Title           : LISP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)
        Authors         : Victor Moreno
                          Dino Farinacci
        Filename        : draft-ietf-lisp-vpn-06.txt
        Pages           : 17
        Date            : 2020-08-03

Abstract:
   This document describes the use of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol
   (LISP) to create Virtual Private Networks (VPNs).  LISP is used to
   provide segmentation in both the LISP data plane and control plane.
   These VPNs can be created over the top of the Internet or over
   private transport networks, and can be implemented by Enterprises or
   Service Providers.  The goal of these VPNs is to leverage the
   characteristics of LISP - routing scalability, simply expressed
   Ingress site TE Policy, IP Address Family traversal, and mobility, in
   ways that provide value to network operators.



The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-vpn/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-vpn-06
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-vpn-06

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lisp-vpn-06


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org<http://tools.ietf.org/>.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/




------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 10:03:01 +0000
From: "Lori Jakab (lojakab)" <lojakab@cisco.com<mailto:lojakab@cisco.com>>
To: Sharon Barkai <sharon.barkai=40getnexar.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40getnexar.com@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org> list" <lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Moving forward with lisp-nexagon
Message-ID: <F0930CF4-FEAB-43C7-877C-B3394CE394EF@cisco.com<mailto:F0930CF4-FEAB-43C7-877C-B3394CE394EF@cisco.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi Sharon,

I think this draft addresses some really interesting use cases, so I would like to see it advanced.

-Lori

> On Aug 2, 2020, at 6:44 PM, Sharon Barkai <sharon.barkai=40getnexar.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40getnexar.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
>
> We have presented the nexagon
>  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-nexagon-04? <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-nexagon-04>
> work at several LISP WG sessions.  We have made significant improvements to the work over that time in AAA, security, privacy, and grammar thanks to prominent non author wg members.
>
> This ID can help show what can be done with lisp mapped addressable-states and brokered mp2mp channels by simply using standard lisp ucast/mcast interfaces.
>
> ID can also help iot / street-processing specs evolve from sending things to a ?server?. Show an interoperable extendible paradigm, and actually interoperate and extend themed-channels with enterprise EID  ?MIBs?.
>
> Before asking the chairs for formal WG adoption as authors, would like to know if folks are interested in seeing this advanced, and willing to help move it forward.
>
> Thank you.
>
> --szb
> Cell: +972.53.2470068
> WhatsApp: +1.650.492.0794
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/attachments/20200804/02e1c68e/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3013 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/attachments/20200804/02e1c68e/attachment.p7s>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 15:17:35 +0000
From: "Fabio Maino (fmaino)" <fmaino@cisco.com<mailto:fmaino@cisco.com>>
To: Sharon Barkai <sharon.barkai=40getnexar.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40getnexar.com@dmarc.ietf.org>>,
        "lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org> list" <lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Moving forward with lisp-nexagon
Message-ID: <9E1D2E74-EB6A-4F42-81FB-45314D88029E@cisco.com<mailto:9E1D2E74-EB6A-4F42-81FB-45314D88029E@cisco.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

It?s indeed a very interesting use case and application for the LISP protocol. As an author, I would like to see the WG involved with this topic.

Thanks,
Fabio

From: lisp <lisp-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:lisp-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Sharon Barkai <sharon.barkai=40getnexar.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40getnexar.com@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Date: Sunday, August 2, 2020 at 9:45 AM
To: "lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org> list" <lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org>>
Subject: [lisp] Moving forward with lisp-nexagon

We have presented the nexagon
 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-nexagon-04 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-nexagon-04>
work at several LISP WG sessions.  We have made significant improvements to the work over that time in AAA, security, privacy, and grammar thanks to prominent non author wg members.


This ID can help show what can be done with lisp mapped addressable-states and brokered mp2mp channels by simply using standard lisp ucast/mcast interfaces.


ID can also help iot / street-processing specs evolve from sending things to a ?server?. Show an interoperable extendible paradigm, and actually interoperate and extend themed-channels with enterprise EID  ?MIBs?.


Before asking the chairs for formal WG adoption as authors, would like to know if folks are interested in seeing this advanced, and willing to help move it forward.


Thank you.

--szb
Cell: +972.53.2470068
WhatsApp: +1.650.492.0794
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/attachments/20200804/1ae462dc/attachment.htm>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp


------------------------------

End of lisp Digest, Vol 141, Issue 2
************************************
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

<ietf-lisp-nexagon.model.1.5.pdf>