[lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-05 - Instance Identifiers and Namespaces
Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Sun, 12 October 2014 00:26 UTC
Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE2D1A00C3 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LWOQ0BQeGvAe for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0148.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BB6E1A00BF for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.146) by CO1PR05MB443.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1049.19; Sun, 12 Oct 2014 00:26:05 +0000
Received: from CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.13.91]) by CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.13.91]) with mapi id 15.00.1049.012; Sun, 12 Oct 2014 00:26:05 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-05 - Instance Identifiers and Namespaces
Thread-Index: Ac/lsr2s/tfhqVRASzK2bqc7Ioa+JQ==
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 00:26:03 +0000
Message-ID: <6482ea5673a44cd5a7fba21fb7e3a24e@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO1PR05MB443;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-forefront-prvs: 0362BF9FDB
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189002)(199003)(76576001)(120916001)(97736003)(99396003)(101416001)(20776003)(76482002)(31966008)(2501002)(4396001)(64706001)(95666004)(54356999)(92566001)(108616004)(105586002)(2656002)(86362001)(122556002)(87936001)(77096002)(85306004)(74316001)(99286002)(80022003)(50986999)(66066001)(2351001)(107046002)(46102003)(33646002)(85852003)(107886001)(230783001)(21056001)(106356001)(229853001)(110136001)(40100003)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1PR05MB443; H:CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/FxWIPBAhc5TIFNfQCav9zm_Il78
Subject: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-05 - Instance Identifiers and Namespaces
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 00:26:09 -0000
Folks, AFAIKS, a LISP site can contain two hosts with the same EID (e.g., 192.0.2.1). LISP uses the Instance-ID to distinguish between the two hosts. If this is the case, does LISP really create two namespaces. Or does it create: - one namespace for RLOCs - another namespace for each Instance-ID If the later, we should fix the document. Ron Bonica
- [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-05 - Instance… Ronald Bonica
- Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-05 - Inst… Albert Cabellos