IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] 6833bis - NMR with locator count !=0

"Victor Moreno (vimoreno)" <vimoreno@cisco.com> Tue, 22 August 2017 06:32 UTC

Return-Path: <vimoreno@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F94A132063 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 23:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VP54i7hOQkRW for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 23:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2F31132195 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 23:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1522; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1503383564; x=1504593164; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=um1/cA4B8E1kfKHZBD3bHnyT/+0Gx6wuxwrSdDKcet8=; b=j5hSFc00SedjzRpJhAo3bM75sQtWdgBgZdwxjUSgXB6aDJxPOMXBnj9X Z+90SbmSj00IELV0kq4VSWrFhkZTdaKR2+Ww1CNOwAluTn9ilbUwWCGCH DlzIO76XZWWhuN3S6Yd5mucL+D7kRqJJmRaBm8lplIzwZjoo/GYBCnmd9 Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CdAAAuz5tZ/5ldJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1pkgRUHjgyQF4Fulh4OggQhC4UbAoQTPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUYAQEBAQIBAQE4NAsFCwIBCBgeECcLJQIEDgWKKQgQrw6LYwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgyqCAoFMgWMrgnyEPTaDQ4IxBaBSApRBkl+WJgEfOIEKdxVJEgGFBAUXgWd2iReBDwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,410,1498521600"; d="scan'208";a="283570319"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Aug 2017 06:32:44 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-012.cisco.com (xch-aln-012.cisco.com [173.36.7.22]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7M6WiBo016484 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:32:44 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com (173.37.102.25) by XCH-ALN-012.cisco.com (173.36.7.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 01:32:43 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) by XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 01:32:43 -0500
From: "Victor Moreno (vimoreno)" <vimoreno@cisco.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
CC: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] 6833bis - NMR with locator count !=0
Thread-Index: AQHTGwzqsqFWeSwYqUmzA1VIigsqYqKQOQEAgAAFmoA=
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:32:43 +0000
Message-ID: <CE2B6A47-99E2-4CA9-B28F-A55A24ADBF24@cisco.com>
References: <6467BB43-AB19-48C4-A3FD-34D5C2E092E8@cisco.com> <d6318116-0157-302d-abe3-4181c7859e19@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <d6318116-0157-302d-abe3-4181c7859e19@joelhalpern.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.111.218]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <B7B23298A8F28240BB6F489A582E06A8@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/KZEGQh_JCgs72IiIGqS8jOE5nto>
Subject: Re: [lisp] 6833bis - NMR with locator count !=0
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:32:47 -0000

Would be mainly conveying the RLOCs of the feasible PETRs dynamically.
As PETRs are brought on-line in the network, they can be configured/added in the Mapping System, rather than touching a multitude of ITRs.
This would also allow a more elegant definition for the support of a default exit to the Internet in the Extranet case defined in the lisp-vpn draft. In this scenario, the RLOC record would convey the RLOC of the PETR plus the IID to which the Internet connects at the PETR.

-v

> On Aug 21, 2017, at 11:12 PM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> 
> Can you explain what information you are conveying with the RLOCs?  I think we would need a clear use case before changing the spec.
> 
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 8/22/17 2:07 AM, Victor Moreno (vimoreno) wrote:
>> Dear WG,
>> As we put some of our specifications to the test in deployments, we have found the ability to return RLOCs dynamically in an NMR to be compelling in a variety of deployment scenarios. Particularly in Networks with multiple Internet exit points.
>> What are the thoughts of the group on allowing NMRs with a locator count !=0?
>> One option to indicate that a map-reply is an NMR could be to assign one of the reserved bits as an NMR flag.
>> Would like to gauge the inclination of the WG before proposing text/edits.
>> -v
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email