[lisp] 6830bis & 6833bis
Albert Cabellos <albert.cabellos@gmail.com> Tue, 15 November 2016 00:42 UTC
Return-Path: <albert.cabellos@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA1C12960A for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:42:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UCeM5yQJWGpJ for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:42:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67C7712957F for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:42:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id t79so133504138wmt.0 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:42:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OrEnCJBN6GgxUvKJhoNuyPYArRvh/9CIDydtuT++A1Q=; b=Cf4Gp2IBXIYyJMnyEsQk3M7+VGHcY4USmfdJ6TkoyrFzmw6p39/vC79cpICAt6Ppfe vpkBEPfzKIESRBzJXKP6zVg9nQNVmoK4mh7o+3r7W5/68z/y3OZM7Dsm9hCa0psbmAxe fy+LnKqHZa3j7FxA/HooTtL8FUvcbxm1xURSqDp1pvfjfQ3SRYRGmzO3kokUxEfZ2jgv I1h0o4XdVYliLWNreOxJVHIyhnA1DEXEqtUmk4exlnxnv1yhrTgKPGi8cnNeNeSxwSXI xNq5NUmRzzU8J1psggJFm9KhlgR8Odau3thoPs1Cb37rAH3fnIWzJ2rLvx4gTlpoMf9h EGJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OrEnCJBN6GgxUvKJhoNuyPYArRvh/9CIDydtuT++A1Q=; b=mcYICr3XTcDqtDy69Xuh30n1EJEOEMIvDwTw9lFEvoFk5JbxzMBZfRVqZmb38TGEwF f0pBh7tfvOoDlosYe2CqrL1IdW7+qYsFkGqTFHMt8K10KP4M/twxn5YFs8t8pAdpSSon 4QfLC6RVQUvjVYHEJNLueUkmmg/l4zxVAU5RneVEJUb1db1fFTnh9UyPgusg8QRaIkl8 M0eIMUJgsaV0rGtJe5QEBqNXP+SW6IZMW8p/QMHvc+H4Bm2NI6w5cPLJa5pOqtHzM8VJ 1AoFmeFBsWI9+elBRwXP5aQIpSpc1DLGg6RFUXAM95bNiN8SCkBBexQ/1A/vUUFfAWlu RBOA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvezOxaFgmmFuHI3v3C7CCBbDJgQVFQ3AqGuVBKv0NqYYSQVwJ1A5QtZQkpV9ivPuk/ugEffhTG/CNHfYw==
X-Received: by 10.25.139.195 with SMTP id n186mr9290734lfd.27.1479170526978; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:42:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.8.202 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:42:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Albert Cabellos <albert.cabellos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 01:42:06 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGE_QeybA8v+7W7xqBYEu=eKjsO4sDt_cZazRTjAzrzQanXS+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ebaa6d2aa4b05414c390e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/WurlFm3ABLb5Zz5XJKNv55hqNbE>
Subject: [lisp] 6830bis & 6833bis
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:42:11 -0000
Hi all We have submitted our take on 6830bis and 6833bis, we´ll present them during the LISP WG meeting: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farinacci-lisp-rfc6830bis-00 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farinacci-lisp-rfc6833bis-00 You can find the diff from RFC6830 and RFC6833 respectively here: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=draft-farinacci-lisp-rfc6830bis-00.txt https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=draft-farinacci-lisp-rfc6833bis-00.txt Thanks Albert
- [lisp] 6830bis & 6833bis Albert Cabellos