Re: [lisp] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-6834bis-12: (with COMMENT)
Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 02 June 2022 12:49 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A5DC15AAE9; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 05:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56wiBu_ksFFO; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 05:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com (mail-wm1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26FBBC15AAE7; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 05:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id p19so2541823wmg.2; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 05:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ayg4MkKdJv0b7Q9ghjYnDkCI+ugeH9kDuaMa6wcW8V0=; b=BS5o3KraM01fy8QGt6I+OKW8qGZB/YBdByGYkAvSErLoZt8ClvZ8wV6uQrvw+3GcN0 WzJfHv4UAhZC2tFZioa01v1l4gWLWGzv93ZrbFzQ9D3oJ9sLhbLsk01Q0qkgdd8wC7E4 X9SdntuK6p491UiQIA46EbvsJe+8/4RtdsPTPLL7219PnAbwZnediBwwx4WBJtFUwn/o HUCimYywe1sRZYP1OrMXJpsPtqiBgOKWsnAmXtPoJNcHj9eARqIhX09R8qCOO9fS5gV6 a8I83xppeTcDsXTuup9hDm4ApSclQhrsJAieS8s9yRXroyjz9+pZnmXtmiDQqynYiYlm EwlQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ayg4MkKdJv0b7Q9ghjYnDkCI+ugeH9kDuaMa6wcW8V0=; b=BWT5j4eM06yYvZ2SJwiAJnfvudzAUC4V8fzxFO/gLnKdcWlo09gbbmdxZklGa6aPkl 5AHQ6HtPOIoQBer76mrOdGcduUdYhW+H9pjy7SQNDLs63FDc7JoxTn/o03BdH2kQNIOy aDoO67thk9UyGGBIpco5iGMn/fHaC/a9/K5Aj1gtQ5FeAkxBtLbJbcVQ6FDgpzzQHC/g j+Y9XrUyKhUi6jwu9ht+NwMI5QvREyzcLNrqiXv6kg8ULiHLLVghASEqYzDSEhzYE3ne ufZCHUNHoHSiSjfIGlDbmov4p2JVcdyhL1wsV9PIwi96g+Z7ggu+Er0KSWzEKup85QrR q1Pg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532sbsz/8l4nA+MSAYt2/QZUPWV6OafImiuxowreb4y6p1FXONWa Re3s2J8wpW5Qiwjj7A3QNbdHz/fl5jh74Y28SxNiJzL9
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxp0J0/1cgQXUbrv2sAz77rUPZQrBCvtvErxhp37Ueg2GqfxPtoGPHuqdHYLdsFm6GG7noBuF/O+/lQPVCPxO4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:acf:b0:397:345f:fe10 with SMTP id c15-20020a05600c0acf00b00397345ffe10mr3949480wmr.15.1654174176337; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 05:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 05:49:35 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <165415136062.40377.6986605180685794599@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <165415136062.40377.6986605180685794599@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 05:49:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsw5Baw5YJk6qo4LUFCy_owhEWFSarZgH3NL0QL_uGrZyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-lisp-6834bis@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org, lisp-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/bYoawwusgb_djcFwYg3CS1tKy5w>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-6834bis-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 12:49:40 -0000
On June 2, 2022 at 2:29:23 AM, Murray Kucherawy wrote: Murray: Hi! ... > The shepherd writeup says: > > > It is the proper type of RFC since it provides updates to RFC 6834 Locator/ > > ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Map-Versioning, which was an experimental > > document. > > I don't follow. Only a Proposed Standard can update an Experimental? The Shepherd meant an update (lower case), not an "Update" (as in the formal action). This document Obsoletes rfc6834. Alvaro.
- [lisp] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-i… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
- Re: [lisp] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on dra… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [lisp] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on dra… Murray S. Kucherawy