IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lisp] One comment to draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana-05.txt

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Thu, 02 February 2017 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71FC1298AC for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 10:26:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.051
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.051 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04=0.556, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id apmvZQ9QoO6E for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 10:26:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22e.google.com (mail-pf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AFF812940B for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 10:26:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id f144so6988651pfa.2 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 10:26:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:references:to:date; bh=X4C7Dr/01tKiQwzG4Dls7VYiTrD2bT9yENJqVNQ8QMM=; b=e6iK9uz02CxYk2xwQKwjrvXrFG/iJesnmbQEqPKzdX99Ki4E9WjTqEQbq/To8HV6ed QNUf5bkBkJ8a5ydsE8DozEFuUP6W82sFiKd05BC8+ZOpc6IKm6ToX1qIahtJ1wvXjztj lKeKJs3KJSOmMrpo+/wxIbL5YghEBikTEtuHgA9ZwmwRHwhOI4Iq/xuG/mklfw1M22xa vdxO531sDFR+cAjNSxZiT82hpicgbdChIdh6FuY7nSr8kg0WmnbtvYIvqtbPgmtsizXS jq/xBn5bkZdSG3J3ykv355MV7+rDCc5ys25eE3mDgLaZXbk/945woYocH1zpkdATAOmY X2VA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:references :to:date; bh=X4C7Dr/01tKiQwzG4Dls7VYiTrD2bT9yENJqVNQ8QMM=; b=IkwBceoyPKK9QLufHsun+t31MzznQrMFgi749yo10LbozFtvLSxgyJ4m64ZqmLGDBz oPxHz/CsVE+I4fcV5pOkZxiFI8qbHEm9NGbKHrlc7T+Wby2SZotgM2w21SC0ZrYyKkoW TYvBo2VAU//B6aN2WUhEi98ve8UEYceKpyp7DpG6QLYgX7WqgQNBElhiiadcNjdi24xi /2072yFXRh51821L/RmaKHRZX+otp8M0HKm36ekfJ5ILzSszdnf8hT1tR8XZTZDkOg7a KqVgOZrOFWdXZNeXjyG2U4tVgAZ7hCtEPpnNqvOwJ/YMlJXZCSw71zke8lumya/D/soe +ZhQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIfNzdwVKe7LQAeVytkqJrVFk9l7lrhTSFOVNJfkKSMfQy6uS4+x5t0J0G6I3XnLw==
X-Received: by 10.98.223.66 with SMTP id u63mr12423740pfg.39.1486059975965; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 10:26:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.197.31.157] (173-11-119-245-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [173.11.119.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s26sm60901088pge.33.2017.02.02.10.26.14 for <lisp@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Feb 2017 10:26:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FAF7C590-41CA-4423-9415-1768848080D9"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Message-Id: <E29F9348-438C-4551-B383-ECE62118C585@gmail.com>
References: <mailman.3778.1486059811.4842.i-d-announce@ietf.org>
To: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 10:26:13 -0800
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/bw3hAD1lgWUB5LLg6oUuLF_2yMk>
Subject: [lisp] One comment to draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana-05.txt
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 18:26:18 -0000

Mohamed, the statement “This document updates RFC6830.” is too broad and easily open to misinterpretation. See my suggestion below.



I suggest this wording (and possibly not in the abstract):

This document introduces a new LISP message type so extenstions to the protocol may be experimented with. The code point is defined in RFC6833bis in which this document references as well as describes how the sub-types for the code point are used.

Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email