IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-28: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Tue, 31 December 2019 03:51 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E271200C3; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:51:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m35FCjKsLDsU; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:51:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7866D12002E; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:51:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id g6so15445506plt.2; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:51:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=hGLDAKrigTyIr8TBVJ9NJkmfUXTdD+LCwjNlR0p9xKk=; b=GHSjvvgTagXxx1AmI2cymIcNHIQLlSBam9Q5ElOfsNIxGNXRT+k1e0F+3jlPWKYdb5 XlA5gn3HoWDtjEBB4D8Fq6LGmVDbNayMQHDfeJzCu3gOoXVWTCEOXU/K3eveuGuEagLP 3Nu9HrlCUOZwxpCY1u+ea/+o8JwZ9g/5bTKu3bAZVT5/aRxIPsKMI98yDcKquzJJqVBb n7OnbG7faynpabx2Jt0v4+a1F60bif8jWly7gwoqbpzQ7bkJp+71kqAX9PUSxocVb8Jd WLMVRrhvQ5VsEz0SpgfjhjQcExcvbXpGRyaIqCOinvyHbI4fQWzYSOCkTKL/tesB1UfN 9RJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=hGLDAKrigTyIr8TBVJ9NJkmfUXTdD+LCwjNlR0p9xKk=; b=P6r/BIL//lKgjDKm7DFlGhZTYLAmAJsUuuk9iiD+5D7ZcTArjDtC0rM/y1MMDO1M0O Hh/l37SEzFexGzy4JcpuF0s8xNSqEOIx5mQ0Sn0r/EZ8D42lPolLGcsPXmr3Z9DubceA IkS+2VLmhw+NTaliq4TMe3TncMvvRCyQyUMySX5gUDCYVTzY8Xq8Id/D0QOq8VsxaTZQ hzcbN9yI4ejocJhtbhMfwa4kWQxAAVOULE2wjSoZwMKHuxS+8WsmP/PWnR7rmuEuIYUj U8ahbQDT7SnUIFpa1IMCGs9IpgEwQrbAsyYsIyPYihM3JWyz2mchrpiMU4SqgvIp7XO4 MymA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVm9vF2Vrc/r7qi08ezEINnVEQbeAowrj9N3QV1TpVpTfW6dnKW zM0LEuWpkd8N8sHCmQSvDEs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqweNJpqHs1nBMaPC+1gjiLyHN0cVnDmDFVbPStKsA/2vwlkM8SydneoQo0idFbuCJ/Ld2Mtvw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:aa8f:: with SMTP id d15mr67144229plr.276.1577764273882; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:51:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:9600:af10:6512:7e57:b31e:6199? ([2601:646:9600:af10:6512:7e57:b31e:6199]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d22sm49752331pgg.52.2019.12.30.19.51.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:51:12 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:51:10 -0800
Message-Id: <DC081FF5-984C-4C2D-95BE-F49338F28143@gmail.com>
References: <20191231021027.GQ35479@kduck.mit.edu>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis@ietf.org, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20191231021027.GQ35479@kduck.mit.edu>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17D5026c)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/c5xEnionPX_oAORt1QIy8j3ZAd4>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-28: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 03:51:16 -0000


> On Dec 30, 2019, at 6:10 PM, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> I'm not sure if you're saying that we should s/RLOC-probe
> Map-Reply/Map-Reply/ or make achange to 6833bis.  Sorry for being confused
> :(

Yes we should make this change. 

Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email