Re: [lisp] RFC 6834bis

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Tue, 15 May 2018 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CE912D77D for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 May 2018 09:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dAjlW7l-KuBS for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 May 2018 09:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22f.google.com (mail-pf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73F6312421A for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 May 2018 09:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id p14-v6so290360pfh.9 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 May 2018 09:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=3xZyn2GYgc6rG08gfURu4dn2jmX4EbT29K/OJBaHZsA=; b=koMb2aArcqpQHVzBh6GM8t95vdyWzIyK97NtBk4jAQMYDBJEqRydCqTVYvSyxK5aQV NjhStLRwOY9BX0vV95NrzhTot+HkE+mdqj1YYq/8tqjGTcoCG5dMUupRlMZVwkr6ehsz h3k0pL8UExNrFHdJpD+YmvRR3ukjIIGjk+YtqYduf4dm8fxhRlGvda5pD+hDo+Cj/bqI ZnaNJlJl26QXvERnmNDq2QzDNcOvLbz6KK7KVC0rRXOBUbZCxy68ZYB/K3fiaVQgYKiZ rUaTkUVbmagDxiEywVktSjzU4s3UwY8Pulhj6yMw0vAFEWwbCPS0JeMMrihKAMUqleh2 1htA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=3xZyn2GYgc6rG08gfURu4dn2jmX4EbT29K/OJBaHZsA=; b=aJbJx6lXg/IGSYf9/U0Kj+Z2JEL5hBc1aGIJi99n6zJ8FGKyZfvRHYY3vE/aSuE++F Jn8yK0AMqx6D2yXf41uUri+P8nA2Zf+qs3aoC4+Fw6+A/DYE/z9yS2NIZT20gkWY2yUh 6ORWaz9yE1wKyJtCfYT2XYhqBSG6sqcSoDvby3WrJy6MlSzRuanTVVsjV3kSukGzKdYZ ke6zDrsVfthwtlo7VyP91UMlyRMj7CupiEq2zPwpGDBJW+aFXOtwtXQqnpfQXykmpEOn CcrhDWP+RwCgxd/+xlz+DcCEN/PbLe+H/539HBm9kRPzflw4fS5JOc6fXRRPVAP6whID XH9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcxq7wlATWp06RWCo0OUb+sgMwphqDwgyzeUZ0GfILNqlMMHrz9 WVPI9NTIYNN0XBxZq6Lq+dW2ZYEk
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZp6Kk1FUiIseUO3hSkKCiyPpoptMkImj7OD0qy4ts3kbJsrk1OjAukIL89xOmSVDT/EtRVD9Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:3745:: with SMTP id e66-v6mr15718848pfa.43.1526401191101; Tue, 15 May 2018 09:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2603:3024:151c:55f0:4d87:388e:4fda:fe4f? ([2603:3024:151c:55f0:4d87:388e:4fda:fe4f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o10-v6sm405049pgc.80.2018.05.15.09.19.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 May 2018 09:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15E302)
In-Reply-To: <0d7fde71-c672-cc24-e523-8383731c5589@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 09:19:49 -0700
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C3EC4004-DE10-4456-B3B7-E13B0F311922@gmail.com>
References: <0d7fde71-c672-cc24-e523-8383731c5589@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/e4pwG6pL2sk5vCGlTUDuPe40Cjk>
Subject: Re: [lisp] RFC 6834bis
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 16:19:53 -0000

I think it is a good plan. Thanks. 

Dino

> On May 15, 2018, at 7:19 AM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> 
> Luigi notied that there is one more document that our PS set depends on.
> RFC 6834: Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Map-Versioning
> 
> Since we will need to move this to PS, the rules prohibit us from simply doing a downref.
> 
> As such, unless our AD tells us we can't expedite this, the plan is:
> 
> Luigi will prepare draft-iannone-lisp-rfc6834bis.
> 
> As soon as he posts it, I will issue a 4 week joint adoption and last call.  We think this one is dead simple and as such there will be no problems with it.
> 
>  -- We will need to see strong support from the working group for advancing it.
>  -- small errors can be fixed as part of this
>  -- If someone has problems with our doing this, they can object and we will slow it all down.  In particular, if there turn out to be hard spots where it is not technically simple, then we have to slow down and do it right.
> 
> Assuming it completes the 4 week call without issues, Luigi will issue any necessary revisions, I will do a shepherd writeup, and we will add it to the stack of things being advanced.
> 
> If someone sees a problem with this plan, please speak up.
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp