[lisp] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-10: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 21 April 2022 03:41 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEBE3A102B; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 20:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf@ietf.org, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, ggx@gigix.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.0.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <165051250242.9791.8932007183476344587@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 20:41:42 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/eHWdRBggXWyZEN29Xl8nLVP0Cg0>
Subject: [lisp] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 03:41:43 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Éric’s ballot already called out that Figure 1 doesn’t match the text in Section 3 (i.e., Figure 1 says “Type = TBD” but the Section 3 text says “Type = 255”). It should read TBD in both places. Suggesting 255, if that is the desired value, only makes sense in Section 6 (as it currently reads). ** Section 6. Following the guidelines of [RFC8126], IANA is asked to assign a value (255 is suggested) for the Vendor Specific LCAF from the "LISP Canonical Address Format (LCAF) Types" registry (defined in [RFC8060]) as follows: The text here calls the registry the “LISP Canonical Address Format (LCAF) Types”. That doesn’t appear to be the official name. Examining https://www.iana.org/assignments/lisp-parameters/lisp-parameters.xhtml#lisp-lcaf-type it appears to be “LISP LCAF Type.”
- [lisp] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [lisp] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-… Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] [Ext] Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection… Amanda Baber
- Re: [lisp] [Ext] Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] [Ext] Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection… Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] [Ext] Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection… Amanda Baber
- Re: [lisp] [Ext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on … Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] [Ext] Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection… Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)