Re: [lisp] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block/

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Thu, 22 May 2014 22:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1BC1A0270 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2014 15:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JdcEK0nZobLR for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2014 15:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailc2.tigertech.net (mailc2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E9561A029C for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2014 15:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0965B4374C for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2014 15:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [129.192.170.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFF9B4373C for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2014 15:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <537E7F21.6070206@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 18:50:09 -0400
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/gBwJj67FPirgXZCrBOCdWGVs9_A
Subject: Re: [lisp] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block/
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 22:50:13 -0000

Having been reminded by my co-chair that the WG LC ended many weeks ago...

The chairs determination is that this document received sufficient WG 
support, and seeing no objections the shepherd will begin the writeup 
process for delivery to the AD.

Authors, please confirm to the list (and thus the shepherd) that all 
relevant IPR you know of has been disclosed (or conversely that you do 
not know of any relevant IPR that has not been disclosed.)

Thank you,
Joel