[lisp] Mapping system observations
Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@gmail.com> Thu, 09 August 2012 20:13 UTC
Return-Path: <damien.saucez@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C448A21F86DA for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 13:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fgdDPPUfw-gq for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 13:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FAC621F86CA for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 13:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgbdr13 with SMTP id dr13so499123wgb.13 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=oudmebF3zcTut9pq3OEH4FHBGXSVBL426xW81nHIy8g=; b=r3xGHbHGpuSEdIg95hUm0sKyz/+lL0xszlVCntF1K6QJfGL1KKwrTtGgzN/vGqchQQ 1u+jaw6cnR458ba+tS8PW1XE0yyDH5f/y9dDVwQhrVm+9KPncyDD4c4c3XEuDJSATQpt gksjyTbq+37UOp4jNRVzjvq66fNlSd8fYA3S3C/XCrpxn0i5mCBu8tqQzjYeoeVxVVKV guvYTkMpI/IkpU2NBREAe54oGqBShP8numTpMSH00FH5HfCh6iqJwHSdfI4LB0rBWRF2 L6vq4ayNatWPLJEmn7XDvxogmu46Pe/px0rm2LyCT2Ni7LAJbxp7uhbAp2svByLEWTIG EAgw==
Received: by 10.180.105.163 with SMTP id gn3mr1259468wib.2.1344543212771; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.139.253] (46.189.101.84.rev.sfr.net. [84.101.189.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cu1sm3548132wib.6.2012.08.09.13.13.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:13:28 +0200
Message-Id: <0131C52A-B54C-4EEE-9C4A-D623FF00D7D2@gmail.com>
To: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1485\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1485)
Cc: Benoit Donnet <benoit.donnet@ulg.ac.be>
Subject: [lisp] Mapping system observations
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 20:13:34 -0000
Hello, We finally had no time to briefly present a measurement campaign we made on the mapping system. The slides are on http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-lisp-8.pdf and I invite you to comment. As you certainly know, the mapping system has been migrated to LISP-DDT with success on 3/14/2012. As the migration was planed, we have decided to measure it! To do so, we used vantage points around the world in different network types (EID space, commercial Internet, research Internet...). These vantage points have measured for a period of about one month the mapping system. To do so, they have send a Map-Request for all the EID prefixes with lig, and this every 15 minutes. We expected to observe a big difference of delay and mappings between ALT and DDT. However, the result we obtain is that the change is not very significant. There is no particular loss of map-Request/Map-Reply during the transition and the delay is not significantly increased or reduced. However, we observe a much more variable delay now with DDT than before where delays were very stable with time. After these measurements, we looked at the long term trends in the mapping system thanks to lispmon. The general trend is that the number of mapping increases (and more particularly the negative mappings) and that very few mappings use several RLOCs. Looking at this. This work is very brief and only show basic results, however, it raises two interesting questions. First, how can we make the DDT retrieval delay more stable (maybe it is just a question of organisation and trafic). Second, can we imagine to simplify the mappings such a way that all the complexity of mappings with the priority, weight, R-bit... is there only when necessary? I am looking forward for your comments, Damien Saucez
- [lisp] Mapping system observations Damien Saucez
- Re: [lisp] Mapping system observations Noel Chiappa
- Re: [lisp] Mapping system observations Damien Saucez
- Re: [lisp] Mapping system observations Lori Jakab
- Re: [lisp] Mapping system observations Vince Fuller
- Re: [lisp] Mapping system observations Damien Saucez
- Re: [lisp] Mapping system observations Vince Fuller
- Re: [lisp] Mapping system observations Damien Saucez