Re: [lisp] #27: ETR may claim a larger prefix than is delegated to it

["Joel M. Halpern" <[e-mail]>]

The general issue of authorization for address claims was noted early on 
as being something for later work, not within scope for the experiment.

This is dealt with in greater detail, including some pointers to ideas 
that we believe will address the over-claiming problem (some initial, 
and some more complete ideas) are described in 
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saucez-lisp-security/, which will 
be discussed in the upcoming meeting and likely be a future work item 
for the working group.

Based on this, I do not see any changes needed to the LISP document to 
resolve this ticket.

Yours,
Joel M. Halpern

On 3/16/2011 4:02 PM, lisp issue tracker wrote:
> #27: ETR may claim a larger prefix than is delegated to it
>
> Changes (by yakov@…):
>
>    * status:  closed =>  reopened
>    * resolution:  fixed =>
>
>
> Comment:
>
>   Before closing the ticket please document how the issue raised by the
>   ticket is resolved.
>