[lisp] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-13: (with COMMENT)

Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 16 February 2023 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41957C16B5CA; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 05:28:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub@ietf.org, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org, ggx@gigix.net, ggx@gigix.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 9.9.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <167655413026.33623.12035491315695851542@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 05:28:50 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/hTwXeLtYN_0AJ0dR0SawqgADfMA>
Subject: [lisp] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 13:28:50 -0000

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this specification. Thanks to Magnus for his detailed
TSVART review, that resulted in improvement is both transport and security
related issues.

I also strongly agree that this specification needs applicability statement to
be added, as it is not aiming for "limited domain". I trust the responsible AD
will make sure there will be applicability statement added as agreed here :
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/ytuGgsIoIVwHoLuq-wr2nPVLzJ4/

The LISP-SEC requirement has already been addressed by Roman is his ballot,
hence supporting that discuss.