[lisp] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
"Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 27 October 2016 12:44 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C6512960C; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.36.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147757226834.24715.16366455756541086706.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:44:28 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/i_cnu-q2BHpEvLDApC-sRoOCp-o>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lisp-ddt@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
Subject: [lisp] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:44:28 -0000
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-08: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-ddt/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 6.4.1: RSA-SHA1 is not the right choice today, shouldn't this be RSA-SHA256? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - 6.4.1: Can you clarify what bits are signed? I'm not quite sure from the description given - you can have more than one signature but you say the the "entire record" is covered. - Section 8: Where's signature validation in the pseudo-code?
- [lisp] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-li… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [lisp] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-iet… Anton Smirnov
- Re: [lisp] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-iet… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [lisp] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-iet… Anton Smirnov
- Re: [lisp] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-iet… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [lisp] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-iet… Anton Smirnov
- Re: [lisp] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-iet… Anton Smirnov