IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lisp] AD Review: draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Thu, 30 August 2012 12:59 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A904F21F85F7 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 05:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.044, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AluY9BQ4HVJF for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 05:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3742521F84C9 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 05:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D789388090; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 05:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clemson.local (nat-gwifi.jhuapl.edu [128.244.87.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A091130017; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 05:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <503F63F5.7030309@innovationslab.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:00:37 -0400
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lisp@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [lisp] AD Review: draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:59:10 -0000

All,
      As a part of the publication process, I have completed my initial 
review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block.  The draft is well-written and 
concise and I thank you for that.

      The only suggestion I would make for this document is to drop the 
use of the 2119 language.  It is only used in a few places and those 
uses are not really appropriate for 2119 language.  I would suggest 
re-writing those guidelines with normal prose and drop the 2119 
boilerplate from the document.

Regards,
Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email