IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-sec-12.txt

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Fri, 02 December 2016 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16930129629; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:36:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iqxY1Q495AUE; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x242.google.com (mail-pf0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FF5D129673; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id c4so13933198pfb.3; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 09:36:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kWJJHGyzBoSMDjulexhuvPNz9V6iUy9WfmKUqbqY+7I=; b=bIfEaUtyOu8WqbqDPOQZmGoYE1hTqY3rbZp+xyD3JyHBPzm0DbSxk61PqcvHdsivPP 2hA1/6w8sm59xYl15Sp6ngRLe2i80Ej8wT0CpzaLa6E3io5P7sjNJ0lHYko+xin1JIWy ZRmu1NK99S0l5Luz9efDHsH6FDBKMnHOACQXv8aYti5YeRwZo6ZtFs/BYUKwf+U5msS9 jzNYGgcIDIJ+TWdk3ME11Esm+N4+iJczbn9eLO1in9bsf/nqdnqcsKleKXQcKsYT2mKY IgeJpJim/5dPHLaEmk47nZVnCubQeiW0KYDWN/w3OOT1yupRi0awIFgqYj1Iy1tPNrZg lFIQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kWJJHGyzBoSMDjulexhuvPNz9V6iUy9WfmKUqbqY+7I=; b=W+EGcF0jYFhVkyi/KgR5G1iAf1rmUfloEWiDjYmP26sxvOK7/UCliU+TXI3MQ98VcQ 55Qcs1lF7MrhYn0evlxSr4xG/mROYHMnfstDqrfuJvaKlDBDuryF7e0zlOZfyTuMhjwc DcbqEfWxOzA6R7DbLDkFIzPj/J8rx53c4pdWe8z/NxzA8mdXGDvSSV0GPtkVpt+QGi3a K+3AZjdNlpcumExEVmXP0jZRuvLjjy69GLR6tBBI74RjCcCzRLrOf/6zXJV3QJ1u9uBa iJFTzZDa8YSEKJmfeMIv3rnHCrEeAFoGyy6IFNS7ve9wnNWPvOtwavZOhNPearizApjU BUPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03P+5v1Dy/ytJIuYGqUueOGJsMKLOp7ep1tLiQnIGrw9KCsn0EdI/nE7NxnHqFaDA==
X-Received: by 10.84.136.75 with SMTP id 69mr97005080plk.52.1480700205660; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 09:36:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.197.31.157] (173-11-119-245-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [173.11.119.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t67sm9278845pfg.13.2016.12.02.09.36.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Dec 2016 09:36:45 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <730AD986-1C72-48D4-B93A-0594A75C5514@gigix.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 09:36:42 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <581EF3B1-820D-4A1A-A76E-F0EF83C85D47@gmail.com>
References: <4F0F4D9C-DEB1-485E-951C-553F42223C96@gigix.net> <730AD986-1C72-48D4-B93A-0594A75C5514@gigix.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/mlN-RvJI-avJ_j3BSq_MWI4DVTM>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-sec-12.txt
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 17:36:49 -0000

The document is absolutely necessary to complete the full-feature security model that the LISP architecture needs. There are multiple implementations of it and it is ready to advance and has been in that state, IMO, for a long time.

So I support moving it along the process.

Dino

> On Dec 2, 2016, at 8:50 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> feedback for this last call has been quite low. For this reason we decide to extend the last call for another two weeks, ending December 16th.
> 
> Please state your opinion on whether this document is ready for publication.
> 
> Silence is NOT consensus.
> 
> Ciao
> 
> Luigi & Joel
> 
>> On 17 Nov 2016, at 09:36, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> The authors of the LISP-Security (LISP-SEC) document [https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-sec/] asked for WG Last Call. 
>> 
>> This email starts the usual two weeks WG Last Call, to end December  1st, 2016.
>> 
>> Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is ready for handing to the AD.
>> If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Luigi & Joel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status