[lisp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful-00.txt
Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr> Sun, 01 July 2012 11:32 UTC
Return-Path: <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EA821F845B for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jul 2012 04:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.182
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.182 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 369kOApkSlKt for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jul 2012 04:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FFB21F8589 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Jul 2012 04:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,504,1336341600"; d="scan'208";a="165166210"
Received: from 172.189.101.84.rev.sfr.net (HELO [172.16.139.253]) ([84.101.189.172]) by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 01 Jul 2012 13:32:03 +0200
From: Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 13:32:03 +0200
References: <20120701113117.13834.44164.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <342B69DC-C0A4-4DAC-BD9F-37DBB5E167E0@inria.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 08:39:48 -0700
Subject: [lisp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful-00.txt
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 11:32:23 -0000
FYI Begin forwarded message: > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful-00.txt > Date: 1 Jul 2012 13:31:17 GMT+02:00 > To: damien.saucez@inria.fr > Cc: cf@cisco.com, olivier.bonaventure@uclouvain.be, luigi.iannone@telecom-paristech.fr > > > A new version of I-D, draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful-00.txt > has been successfully submitted by Damien Saucez and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Filename: draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful > Revision: 00 > Title: LISP ITR Graceful Restart > Creation date: 2012-07-01 > WG ID: Individual Submission > Number of pages: 11 > URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful-00.txt > Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful-00 > > > Abstract: > The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) is a map-and-encap > mechanism to enable the communication between hosts identified with > their Endpoint IDentifier (EID) over the Internet where EIDs are not > routable. To do so, packets toward EIDs are encapsulated in packets > with routing locators (RLOCs) to form dynamic tunnels. An Ingress > Tunnel Router (ITR) that encapsulates EID packets determines tunnel > endpoints via mappings that associate EIDs to RLOCs. Before > encapsulating a packet, the ITR queries the mapping system to obtain > the mapping associated to the EID of the packet it must encapsulate. > Such mapping is cached by the ITR in its local EID-to-RLOC cache for > any subsequent encapsulation for the same EID. LISP is scalable > because the EID-to-RLOC cache of an ITR, which is initially empty, is > populated progressively according to the traffic going through the > ITR. However, after an ITR is restarted, e.g., for maintenance > reason, its cache is empty which means that all packets that are re- > routed to the freshly restarted ITR will cause cache misses and a > potentially high loss rate. In this draft, we present mechanisms to > reduce the negative impact on traffic caused by the restart of an ITR > in a LISP network. > > > > > The IETF Secretariat
- [lisp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sa… Damien Saucez