[lisp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful-00.txt

Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr> Sun, 01 July 2012 11:32 UTC

Return-Path: <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EA821F845B for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jul 2012 04:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.182
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.182 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 369kOApkSlKt for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jul 2012 04:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FFB21F8589 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Jul 2012 04:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,504,1336341600"; d="scan'208";a="165166210"
Received: from 172.189.101.84.rev.sfr.net (HELO [172.16.139.253]) ([84.101.189.172]) by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 01 Jul 2012 13:32:03 +0200
From: Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 13:32:03 +0200
References: <20120701113117.13834.44164.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <342B69DC-C0A4-4DAC-BD9F-37DBB5E167E0@inria.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 08:39:48 -0700
Subject: [lisp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful-00.txt
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 11:32:23 -0000

FYI

Begin forwarded message:

> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful-00.txt
> Date: 1 Jul 2012 13:31:17 GMT+02:00
> To: damien.saucez@inria.fr
> Cc: cf@cisco.com, olivier.bonaventure@uclouvain.be, luigi.iannone@telecom-paristech.fr
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Damien Saucez and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Filename:	 draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful
> Revision:	 00
> Title:		 LISP ITR Graceful Restart
> Creation date:	 2012-07-01
> WG ID:		 Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 11
> URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful-00.txt
> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful
> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful-00
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>   The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) is a map-and-encap
>   mechanism to enable the communication between hosts identified with
>   their Endpoint IDentifier (EID) over the Internet where EIDs are not
>   routable.  To do so, packets toward EIDs are encapsulated in packets
>   with routing locators (RLOCs) to form dynamic tunnels.  An Ingress
>   Tunnel Router (ITR) that encapsulates EID packets determines tunnel
>   endpoints via mappings that associate EIDs to RLOCs.  Before
>   encapsulating a packet, the ITR queries the mapping system to obtain
>   the mapping associated to the EID of the packet it must encapsulate.
>   Such mapping is cached by the ITR in its local EID-to-RLOC cache for
>   any subsequent encapsulation for the same EID.  LISP is scalable
>   because the EID-to-RLOC cache of an ITR, which is initially empty, is
>   populated progressively according to the traffic going through the
>   ITR.  However, after an ITR is restarted, e.g., for maintenance
>   reason, its cache is empty which means that all packets that are re-
>   routed to the freshly restarted ITR will cause cache misses and a
>   potentially high loss rate.  In this draft, we present mechanisms to
>   reduce the negative impact on traffic caused by the restart of an ITR
>   in a LISP network.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat