Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana-05.txt

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Fri, 03 February 2017 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7321294DA for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:37:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XXLqxAqeThc6 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:37:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x236.google.com (mail-pg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1D6D12969C for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:37:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 194so8633543pgd.2 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:37:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=9fkp+LX1szBW6/7nNvevMv7reiuk0hKgVoafmw9h7XM=; b=ka74fVBpl3GX+Xp7pk2Sxd079zMcGlTlAjl4AECATHD2xROuuZmS4aMc0w3cWTLQBQ cNSTd6xRPA2ds3/WasVv4Sao19sssTa+n38h/HAwhP47/RBvnoHPw/5mUuKc5vU7X3W7 m+9wq7mtCstQeJIuWiVgIyDYqZD7h02TD4xK4Bk0g9CVQK50bQPhJVBUBowh5NNk49w0 mL72ZupzHYU0Ub3aLvbURJho55HNZ8SujbMwzPWuWvFkucXZ1aocfSlnKdC9FTgZ2ngJ wH1v6FDK3n/DOz2BZfhnKisLSTT05cs7vlQ+jP32PPCQTSmbyteH/+XkVA34AOD6sFSj xyoA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=9fkp+LX1szBW6/7nNvevMv7reiuk0hKgVoafmw9h7XM=; b=V1QRbsy7J9M9BI7wjV2UZf446v4DSUNDScnSriie79ECeUxJCSEoOCo7LIbHJc8EVB zqgJvPBOPU1hgqew20cZK0E33YZM238r1cfm4oNBexFQaMKu5um5KwuREZNs5NtwNE1m tiAINb506xV/deAk0mWgEc+bZDx4ttG7dWT+wrcxzxefn2XQ0EPgWuKCBitf/v3rxXwH eqx1UazooxLZU6owJXHRRqy530WqTFQUcr0ytj+AkGaIE3rHjZB9z21YCUzieHvsO/tK 7hnhv/bWET8l0E6LkHJt779LR7q8a39aG2cbTK8OzmRfZzoU1jZdprQMYZRzSMeVhENt 0n7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLbB6nry718zLq2J4MEnrclmqcU45iJo7o/Nwn3KRqCBW+6/Rf3urLhWbH+TipXnQ==
X-Received: by 10.84.218.5 with SMTP id q5mr22848834pli.80.1486147046131; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:37:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.197.31.157] (173-11-119-245-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [173.11.119.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p66sm68859442pfb.88.2017.02.03.10.37.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:37:25 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009DF8EBE@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:37:24 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3A9D7D04-BEA9-4494-A6E3-238B236AD849@gmail.com>
References: <148602047542.18619.11155947305350239971.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <92251959-8AE6-4629-827D-CFDD7761C06B@gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009DF8EBE@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/p-WRDulQ2hYlUUQXQaDWZIgO8yg>
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana-05.txt
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 18:37:29 -0000

Okay, thanks.

Dino

> On Feb 2, 2017, at 10:25 PM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dino, all,
>  
> I do think the NEW text in -06 is clear about the update:
>  
>    This document updates RFC6830 by defining a registry for LISP Packet
>    Types assignments.
>  
> RFC6833bis will need to point to the registry to define new control messages. No need to add a reference to RFC6833bis, IMHO.
>  
> Cheers,
> Med
>  
> De : lisp [mailto:lisp-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Dino Farinacci
> Envoyé : jeudi 2 février 2017 19:23
> À : internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Cc : lisp@ietf.org; i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana-05.txt
>  
> Mohamed, the statement “This document updates RFC6830.” is too broad and easily open to misinterpretation. See my suggestion below.
>  
> <image002.png>
> I suggest this wording (and possibly not in the abstract):
>  
> This document introduces a new LISP message type so extenstions to the protocol may be experimented with. The code point is defined in RFC6833bis in which this document references as well as describes how the sub-types for the code point are used.
>  
> Dino
> 
> 
> On Feb 1, 2017, at 11:27 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : LISP Shared Extension Message & IANA Registry for LISP Packet Type Allocations
>        Authors         : Mohamed Boucadair
>                          Christian Jacquenet
>           Filename        : draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana-05.txt
>           Pages           : 6
>           Date            : 2017-02-01
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document defines a registry for Locator/ID Separation Protocol
>   (LISP) Packet Type allocations.  It also specifies a LISP shared
>   message type for defining future extensions and conducting
>   experiments without consuming a LISP packet type codepoint for each
>   extension.
> 
>   This document updates RFC6830.
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana-05
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana-05
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp