Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-10
LINDNER Manfred <Manfred.Lindner@frequentis.com> Tue, 24 April 2018 07:23 UTC
Return-Path: <Manfred.Lindner@frequentis.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58799127337 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0JErMsDKd9TH for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.frequentis.com (mail1.frequentis.com [195.20.158.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13336124BFA for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.49,321,1520895600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="28249341"
Received: from vie190nt.frequentis.frq ([172.16.1.190]) by mail1.frequentis.com with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2018 09:23:38 +0200
Received: from vie196nt.frequentis.frq ([172.16.1.196]) by vie190nt.frequentis.frq ([172.16.1.190]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:23:38 +0200
From: LINDNER Manfred <Manfred.Lindner@frequentis.com>
To: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
CC: HAINDL Bernhard <Bernhard.HAINDL@frequentis.com>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-10
Thread-Index: AdPbnNA0UWpYWti/SxqpWzzjZm38cQ==
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 07:23:37 +0000
Message-ID: <CF56918A04085A419C73063BED83588B0167AB9AE9@vie196nt>
Accept-Language: de-DE, de-AT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.16.33.16]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CF56918A04085A419C73063BED83588B0167AB9AE9vie196nt_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/q-2OCkAc1pWvaN9z8YIqgzu7uUk>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-10
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 07:26:23 -0000
I have read the document several times in details and I fully support handing the document to the AD. Thanks Manfred Lindner From: Fabio Maino [mailto:fmaino@cisco.com] Sent: Montag, 23. April 2018 23:51 To: HAINDL Bernhard <Bernhard.HAINDL@frequentis.com>; LINDNER Manfred <Manfred.Lindner@frequentis.com> Subject: Fwd: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-10 Bernhard, Manfred, the call to support handing over to the Area Directors of RFC6833bis and RFC6830bis is open for another couple of days. Could you please reply to the messages below sent by Luigi to the mailing list and state that you support handing the document to the AD. This is be key to set the path for LISP becoming a standard track RFC. Thanks, Fabio -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-10 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 10:43:57 -0700 From: Fabio Maino <fmaino@cisco.com><mailto:fmaino@cisco.com> To: lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org> I have read the document and I think it's ready to be handed to the AD. I feel the document does a very good job of describing the LISP CP, and addresses the issues that were raised by the WG. Thanks, Fabio On 4/5/18 7:35 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: Hi All, During our last meeting it was apparent that the work on the LISP document [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-10] seems done and the document ready for WG Last Call. This email starts the usual two weeks WG Last Call, to end April 20th, 2018. Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is ready for handing to the AD. If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns. Thanks Luigi & Joel _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
- [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bi… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc68… Alberto Rodriguez-Natal
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc68… Fabio Maino
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc68… John Lemon
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc68… Lori Jakab
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc68… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc68… Victor Moreno (vimoreno)
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc68… LINDNER Manfred
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc68… Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole)
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc68… HAINDL Bernhard
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc68… Vina Ermagan (vermagan)
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc68… Johnson Leong (joleong)
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc68… Luigi Iannone