[lisp] Clarification on issue #16 Map versioning Discussion

Luigi Iannone <luigi@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de> Sat, 26 September 2009 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <luigi@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>
X-Original-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EB03A6833 for <lisp@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.68
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.68 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.316, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fvn45ZA8+0-A for <lisp@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de (mail.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.220.252]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE45C3A67C1 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dyn100.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de (dyn100.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.220.100]) by mail.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A649B700D293 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:13:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: Luigi Iannone <luigi@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-5-785729427"
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:13:56 +0200
Message-Id: <0F04DDD8-A0DB-4ECD-A513-F4D6DC942F1A@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>
To: lisp@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076)
Subject: [lisp] Clarification on issue #16 Map versioning Discussion
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:12:47 -0000

Hi,

The current description of issue #16 Map Versioning Discussion is a  
bit misleading.

The current one is:

draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning-00 proposes introducing a map  
versioning field into LISP. Dino proposes to include text in lisp-04  
that has been discussed with the authors of that draft. This issue  
tracks whether we have WG consensus to do that and if not may turn  
into an issue for the broder map versioning issues.

After the discussion on the mailinglist (also concerning the R-bit) I  
think that a more exact description would be:

New proposed one:

draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning-00 proposes introducing the  
optional possibility for LISP header to transport map version numbers.  
Luigi will provide a new version of the draft which will include both  
discussion from the mailinglist as well as the discussion with all  
LISP developers. This means that all the details of the map versioning  
support will be detailed in the versioning draft and not in the main  
LISP specs.
After publication of the new map versioning draft, the WG will discuss  
its technical validity and how to proceed with the work.


Would be possible to change the description on the issue tracker?


Luigi