IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7052 (4256)

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Mon, 09 March 2015 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084F91A893A for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 07:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X4a02nUK1lg9 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 07:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 666021A894C for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 07:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E82888158; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 07:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Brians-MacBook-Pro.local (swifi-nat.jhuapl.edu [128.244.87.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADBF1368279; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 07:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54FDA92F.9060902@innovationslab.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 10:07:43 -0400
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Gregg Schudel (gschudel)" <gschudel@cisco.com>
References: <20150204092419.B7DE3180092@rfc-editor.org> <54D4C0BB.3030906@innovationslab.net> <EDF4C663-E6D0-4D93-8117-203538C20C83@cisco.com> <54D4D87E.7060807@innovationslab.net> <F412925B-8EA0-414E-AC9B-263F51715059@cisco.com> <54D4E142.6020409@innovationslab.net> <8A99A6AF-5E6D-458B-B7F8-8B4DE2FEA182@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <8A99A6AF-5E6D-458B-B7F8-8B4DE2FEA182@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fpcSBBKSXT7ojAa5kpVPFOucxlJU4kkOD"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/ugZ2hz1lEywSpIpTZ-2dXkJzLec>
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>, "ted.lemon@nominum.com" <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [lisp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7052 (4256)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:08:11 -0000


On 2/6/15 12:58 PM, Gregg Schudel (gschudel) wrote:
> 
> On Feb 6, 2015, at 7:44 AM, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:
> 
>> It turns out that the discussion during review was with the upper limit.
>> I can't find any reference to discussions on the lower limit.  Authors?
> 
> going back to check Brian - it was a while ago.

Have we gotten anywhere with this check?  The erratum is sitting in a
less-than-useful state at this point.

Regards,
Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email