Re: [lisp] Is there a dedicated control plane channel for interface to the Mapping system?

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Fri, 01 November 2013 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669F121E84CD for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IrGjs9AGwFXg for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B2C21E844E for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id C303E18C198; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:17:50 -0400 (EDT)
To: lisp@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20131101161750.C303E18C198@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:17:50 -0400
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [lisp] Is there a dedicated control plane channel for interface to the Mapping system?
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:17:56 -0000

PS:

    > From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>

    > Is there a dedicated control plane channel for interface to the Mapping
    > system? Or if the interface to the mapping system is via the data plane?

On re-reading this, I realized you're probably actually asking something on
the order of 'can nodes interact with the Mapping System with ordinary IP
packets, or can they only send LISP-encapsulated packets to it'.

I honestly don't know the answer to that; I _think_ the spec calls for
packets to the mapping system to be encapsulated (for historical kludgy
reasons that I never liked, so I try not to think about this corner of the
design), but whether a Map-Resolver would barf if it received an
un-encapsulated Map-Request is probably an implementation-specific question.

	Noel