IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lmap] draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-05: Controller timeout

"Carey, Timothy (Timothy)" <timothy.carey@alcatel-lucent.com> Tue, 12 May 2015 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <timothy.carey@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECDD1B2C70 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2015 06:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ki4MmrrRR39m for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2015 06:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B05411B2C5D for <lmap@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2015 06:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.5.2.65]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id C6785FF3BC8B5; Tue, 12 May 2015 13:11:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from US70UWXCHHUB02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uwxchhub02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.49]) by us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t4CDBVFR022662 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 12 May 2015 09:11:35 -0400
Received: from US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.10.167]) by US70UWXCHHUB02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.49]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 12 May 2015 09:11:32 -0400
From: "Carey, Timothy (Timothy)" <timothy.carey@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Thread-Topic: [lmap] draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-05: Controller timeout
Thread-Index: AdCMHecUFUgxoWRISVOQIyTHkXEC2AAnxEkAAATNJ5AACC2i8P//w/gAgAA9MzA=
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:11:31 +0000
Message-ID: <9966516C6EB5FC4381E05BF80AA55F77BA261873@US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <9966516C6EB5FC4381E05BF80AA55F77BA2612C2@US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <20150512100724.GC26662@elstar.local> <9966516C6EB5FC4381E05BF80AA55F77BA261773@US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <20150512124412.GD41964@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20150512124412.GD41964@elstar.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.17]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/Yb_ZdUXQIDJz7wVXcUhKEZy3T2U>
Cc: "lmap@ietf.org" <lmap@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lmap] draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-05: Controller timeout
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:11:42 -0000

No - but how would you represent a 10 Gig Ethernet interface with a 32-bit signed integer using bps as the unit?

-----Original Message-----
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 7:44 AM
To: Carey, Timothy (Timothy)
Cc: lmap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lmap] draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-05: Controller timeout

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:33:27PM +0000, Carey, Timothy (Timothy) wrote:
> 
> I will say though that the interface speed may become a problem if you leave it as an int since the unit is bps.
>

Why? Do you have interfaces that send fractional bits per second? The IF-MIB has worked for decades with an INTEGER type for interface speeds.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email