Re: [lmap] LMAP framework draft

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Thu, 11 July 2013 09:20 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7642C21F9F8A for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 02:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.89
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.291, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HTi2vB+9X8JK for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 02:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2E421F9F58 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 02:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArEIAKR33lGHCzI1/2dsb2JhbABagmghMk2tTZQDgQkWdIIjAQEBAQMSKD8MBAIBCA0BAgEEAQEBChQJBzIUCQgCBAENBQgah20Bmxqbe48wMQcGgwNsA5kDhR2LBIMRgig
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,1042,1363147200"; d="scan'208";a="19647082"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.53]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2013 05:19:52 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC02.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.12]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2013 05:14:01 -0400
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC02.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.12]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:19:50 +0200
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [lmap] LMAP framework draft
Thread-Index: AQHOfWXoMwAA0GKX80uTiSsuxfOGrpld0R4QgAAh/ACAAGeqAIAA2ECA
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:19:50 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA1286905E@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <51DD4E33.5000101@cisco.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA1286526E@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <51DD86FC.1040605@cisco.com> <20130710161930.GA65045@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20130710161930.GA65045@elstar.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.45]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "lmap-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <lmap-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Aamer Akhter <aakhter@cisco.com>, "lmap@ietf.org" <lmap@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lmap] LMAP framework draft
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lmap>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:20:05 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-
> university.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 7:19 PM
> To: Paul Aitken
> Cc: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); lmap-chairs@tools.ietf.org; Aamer Akhter;
> lmap@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [lmap] LMAP framework draft
> 
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 05:08:28PM +0100, Paul Aitken wrote:
> > Dan,
> >
> > >How much meeting time would you need to spend on this? As a rule we
> would strongly prefer to avoid presentations, ask participants to come
> prepared with the I-Ds already read, and use the precious meeting time
> for discussions.
> >
> > Generally, I would agree. However in this case, this draft would be a
> > good starting point for the discussion.
> >
> > Even if we had not written this draft, it would be worthwhile
> > considering what the necessary building blocks are for LMAP, what we
> > already have, and what's missing so we can focus WG attention on the
> > gaps.
> >
> > I could present the draft in 10 minutes. However, the framework
> > discussion should be longer.
> 
> I guess it is too early to ask but how much different is this I-D going
> to be from draft-eardley-lmap-framework-01.txt?
> 
> /js
> 


Individual contributions are welcome at this point. If there are more than one contribution for a deliverable the WG will discuss what is to be used from each of those. 

Regards,

Dan