Re: [lmap] Merged framework draft
<trevor.burbridge@bt.com> Mon, 23 September 2013 11:03 UTC
Return-Path: <trevor.burbridge@bt.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2583E21F9C47 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 04:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.884
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.884 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.115, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_72=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CnARpUaZtxzZ for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 04:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpe1.intersmtp.com (smtp63.intersmtp.com [62.239.224.236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F7121F9AA8 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 04:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EVMHT68-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net (10.36.3.105) by RDW083A007ED63.smtp-e3.hygiene.service (10.187.98.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.298.1; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:03:42 +0100
Received: from EMV64-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net ([169.254.2.193]) by EVMHT68-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net ([10.36.3.105]) with mapi; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:03:42 +0100
From: trevor.burbridge@bt.com
To: marcelo@it.uc3m.es, lmap@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:03:40 +0100
Thread-Topic: [lmap] Merged framework draft
Thread-Index: Ac64PlvJ85+HBdwnSZidzMfN/rJmZgADesjQ
Message-ID: <ED51D9282D1D3942B9438CA8F3372EB72C2E55546B@EMV64-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net>
References: <A2E337CDB7BC4145B018B9BEE8EB3E0D3FF9CFD7CE@EMV67-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA128E22FE@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <A2E337CDB7BC4145B018B9BEE8EB3E0D3FF9CFD7E0@EMV67-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net> <52400816.7070900@it.uc3m.es>
In-Reply-To: <52400816.7070900@it.uc3m.es>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [lmap] Merged framework draft
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lmap>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:03:55 -0000
Also for myself. Fairly comprehensive and captures all of the major points that have been discussed/agreed so far. Trevor. >-----Original Message----- >From: lmap-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:lmap-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >marcelo bagnulo braun >Sent: 23 September 2013 10:21 >To: lmap@ietf.org >Subject: Re: [lmap] Merged framework draft > >agree > >El 23/09/13 11:04, philip.eardley@bt.com escribió: >> >> Personally I think it is >> >> *From:*Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com] >> *Sent:* 23 September 2013 09:56 >> *To:* Eardley,PL,Philip,TUB8 R; lmap@ietf.org >> *Subject:* RE: Merged framework draft >> >> Hi, >> >> Thanks to Philip and all the authors for the good work. >> >> We need however to be a little more aggressive. The WG charter >> includes the following milestone. >> >> Sep 2013 >> >> >> >> Initial WG I-D for the LMAP Framework including terminology >> >> According to the authors - is this I-D in good enough shape for >> becoming the initial WG I-D? If the authors say 'yes' the chairs can >> ask on the WG list about consensus on this issue. >> >> We have a similar milestone for the Use Cases document. >> >> Regards, >> >> Dan >> >> *From:*lmap-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:lmap-bounces@ietf.org> >> [mailto:lmap-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *philip.eardley@bt.com >> <mailto:philip.eardley@bt.com> >> *Sent:* Monday, September 23, 2013 11:47 AM >> *To:* lmap@ietf.org <mailto:lmap@ietf.org> >> *Subject:* [lmap] Merged framework draft >> >> We have been working on a framework draft that merges the previous 2 >> framework drafts & the terminology draft, as well as including various >> things that have been discussed on the list since. >> >> Our plan is to produce an update before the Vancouver deadline. We >> have a few things that we're planning to work on, but we wanted to get >> it out in order to get everyone else's comments. >> >> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-folks-lmap-framework-00.txt >> >> Terminology: >> >> Information Model definition tweaked, new definition for Subscriber >> and Test Traffic. >> >> Protocol Model: >> >> Added a high-level protocol model >> >> Privacy considerations: >> >> A substantial new section. It may be better removing it and security >> considerations into a new draft about threats and how to alleviate them? >> >> Looking forward to the discussions! >> >> Phil, Al, Paul, Marcelo, Aamer, Trevor. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lmap mailing list >> lmap@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap > >_______________________________________________ >lmap mailing list >lmap@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap
- [lmap] Merged framework draft philip.eardley
- Re: [lmap] Merged framework draft Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [lmap] Merged framework draft philip.eardley
- Re: [lmap] Merged framework draft marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [lmap] Merged framework draft trevor.burbridge
- Re: [lmap] Merged framework draft MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [lmap] Merged framework draft Brian Trammell
- Re: [lmap] Merged framework draft Aamer Akhter (aakhter)