Re: [lmap] incoming liaison statement from IEEE Project P802.16.3

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Wed, 10 April 2013 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BEF121F937B for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.383, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nRtTZXqrYuAD for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579BA21F92EF for <lmap@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius4.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.49]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB42F20BE3; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:36:34 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius4.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yGPVhFS4eSYf; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:36:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42CF020BE1; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:36:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1561D2590D5C; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:36:39 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:36:39 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Jérôme Benoit <jerome.benoit@grenouille.com>
Message-ID: <20130410203639.GA7131@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: Jérôme Benoit <jerome.benoit@grenouille.com>, trevor.burbridge@bt.com, lmap@ietf.org
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA0BB87E@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <20130405142245.47a5d4d2@nemesis.grenouille.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6113029AA43@GAALPA1MSGUSR9L.ITServices.sbc.com> <20130407063037.09cd9996@nemesis.grenouille.com> <ED51D9282D1D3942B9438CA8F3372EB729D08CE997@EMV64-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net> <20130408193339.7f91eb3b@nemesis.grenouille.com> <ED51D9282D1D3942B9438CA8F3372EB729D08CEFC8@EMV64-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net> <20130410195434.GA6782@nemesis.grenouille.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20130410195434.GA6782@nemesis.grenouille.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: trevor.burbridge@bt.com, lmap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lmap] incoming liaison statement from IEEE Project P802.16.3
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lmap>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:36:37 -0000

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 09:54:34PM +0200, Jérôme Benoit wrote:
> 
> ISPs operate the whole measurement system that will permit to
> evaluate themselves with no mechanisms that will permit to ensure
> the neutrality of the measurement system ... I hope you're kidding ?
> If not, such a measurement system where judge are also the party is
> just a big joke that will cost money to the people and where people
> will be able to participate, review, trust ... fantastic ! No ?

There are multiple use cases with different motivations and different
goals and we should not mess them up. The ISP use case has a rather
detailed description:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-linsner-lmap-use-cases-02

Perhaps it helps if we discuss concrete parts of the text in this
draft so that we can improve the document.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>