[lmap] Feedback on draft-nagami-lmap-use-case-measurement-provider
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 22 July 2013 14:31 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C3D21F8427 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 07:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HbhsF+-ETEWV for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 07:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC11D21E809A for <lmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 07:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6MES6NN019639 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:28:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6MERa0Q006079 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:27:47 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <51ED4150.6070907@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:27:28 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "lmap@ietf.org" <lmap@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [lmap] Feedback on draft-nagami-lmap-use-case-measurement-provider
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lmap>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:31:08 -0000
Dear authors, Next to the points I made regarding to draft-linsner-lmap-use-cases, which are applicable here as well, I have one extra point: I like the fact that the draft covers the smartphone. This use case is completely different. I might not care if a MA generates some packets from my home, but I care if this is from my smartphone and my bill is pay per volume. The roaming price are still expensive. One of the goal behind this email is to generate discussions, either on the list, or during the IETF meeting next week. Regards, Benoit
- [lmap] Feedback on draft-nagami-lmap-use-case-mea… Benoit Claise
- Re: [lmap] Feedback on draft-nagami-lmap-use-case… Nagami Kenichi