[LOOPS] Another relevant draft in TCPM: ECN++
Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Thu, 07 May 2020 16:50 UTC
Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: loops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: loops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041BD3A0B4A for <loops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 May 2020 09:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0FmMgKggZjPx for <loops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 May 2020 09:50:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out02.uio.no (mail-out02.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:8210::71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87E1F3A0CE7 for <loops@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 May 2020 09:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx11.uio.no ([129.240.10.83]) by mail-out02.uio.no with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93.0.4) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1jWjj4-0003XY-7T for loops@ietf.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 18:50:22 +0200
Received: from ti0182q160-4479.bb.online.no ([84.202.168.179] helo=[192.168.1.4]) by mail-mx11.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) user michawe (Exim 4.93.0.4) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1jWjj3-0005EH-O9 for loops@ietf.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 18:50:22 +0200
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
Message-Id: <F66D8A55-2C30-47B2-9002-6034624EAC17@ifi.uio.no>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 18:50:20 +0200
To: loops@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: neutral (mail-mx11.uio.no: 84.202.168.179 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ifi.uio.no) client-ip=84.202.168.179; envelope-from=michawe@ifi.uio.no; helo=[192.168.1.4];
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: DCEB2D6B6254B7A0BD16975BB13BA1A28CC65C29
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/loops/c3wJCToIemNGDpPwBU31CDmHc1I>
Subject: [LOOPS] Another relevant draft in TCPM: ECN++
X-BeenThere: loops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Local Optimizations on Path Segments <loops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/loops>, <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/loops/>
List-Post: <mailto:loops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/loops>, <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 16:50:55 -0000
ECN++: Adding Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to TCP Control Packets draft-ietf-tcpm-generalized-ecn-05 … for TCP traffic, we probably must require ECN support to help at all; this draft is about using ECN to give some loss protection to the packets that need it the most (SYN, ..). Quite relevant for LOOPS, I think. Cheers, Michael
- [LOOPS] Another relevant draft in TCPM: ECN++ Michael Welzl