[lp-wan] Proposed Charter

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Sun, 24 April 2016 10:07 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085D012D16A for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 03:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IM8_gku5HEvH for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 03:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFA7612D160 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 03:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11638; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1461492440; x=1462702040; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=6gUC5HgxOJfLu15cifNQjBuS0ZUP2nUIr79RVU/t89w=; b=S9QCsvxN5kO2NjjGeLZnLOqV7E8okr5hWPwHwEsWCAsIQeYswe+fIG0i MOvBPv8iRFfxicgv8xLHPix32LlcRTfINS02GCtWqUDolLJFq0xvM5z68 Qrd+VeGocePHGVySHtcDolftcZpKSDqon6DgQqDVgMS5UtcQoJT1MRwrI k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AlAgBhmhxX/49dJa1egmxMU30GtHuEcwENgXWGDgIcezgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhEEBAQEEIwpeARkEAQEoAwIEMBQJCQEEARIIDogUr1KQQgEBAQEBAQEBAgEBAQEBAQEBAReGIYlAgkqCVgWYDwGIcIUdgW2ETYhdjy4BHgEBQoIFG4FLbIh8fwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,526,1454976000"; d="scan'208,217";a="265461500"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Apr 2016 10:07:19 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u3OA7JfE011052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:07:19 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 05:07:19 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 05:07:19 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Ana Minaburo <ana@minaburo.com>, "lp-wan@ietf.org" <lp-wan@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Proposed Charter
Thread-Index: AdGeEODxYfOKK4NnTVKT5kcUbWCEsQ==
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:07:05 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:06:51 +0000
Message-ID: <cfbb1fd2478747c98c139036f1b51939@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.55.22.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_cfbb1fd2478747c98c139036f1b51939XCHRCD001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/GNB8KaX8AshqAy3T1XgLkD8A3CQ>
Subject: [lp-wan] Proposed Charter
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:07:25 -0000

Hello Ana:

The needs for this WG would be very similar to these for 6TiSCH when we created the group.

We have in front of us a radically novel technology for which a mix of education work (towards the IETF), best practice work (selecting existing and influencing new work in existing WG), and some new standard track work for components that just do not exist.

I’ll post a proposed charter as a new thread;

Take care;

Pascal

From: lp-wan [mailto:lp-wan-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ana Minaburo
Sent: lundi 18 avril 2016 23:03
To: lp-wan@ietf.org
Subject: [lp-wan] Focused Scope for LPWAN WG at Berlin

Hello again,

Well in this message I would like to discuss the scope of the WG. We need to define the focused gaps we want to work in. Let's agree about which are the subjects we want to study,

I think the following points are vey important in order to create the WG, please tell me which other you think we need to add.


1. IPv6
draft-gomez-lpwan-ipv6-analysis-00
IP End to End Communication
IPv6 MTU requires fragmentation
ND will be configured in advanced

2. Header Compression
draft-toutain-lp-wan-compression-context-00
New Mechanism adapted to challenged networks

3.  Security
Personal information need to be secured,

4. Management
draft-pelov-core-cosol-01
draft-veillette-core-cool-01
draft-somaraju-core-sid-00

Regards
Ana