Re: [lp-wan] Call for adoption of IP Protocol Number (draft-moskowitz-intarea-schc-ip-protocol-number)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 03 February 2024 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E476EC14F74A; Sat, 3 Feb 2024 07:15:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NJc_1iVpTfa1; Sat, 3 Feb 2024 07:15:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C00EC14F5FE; Sat, 3 Feb 2024 07:15:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eduroam-0872.wlan.uni-bremen.de (eduroam-0872.wlan.uni-bremen.de [134.102.19.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4TRx6L3HwxzDCbM; Sat, 3 Feb 2024 16:15:38 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <1414215348.5937431.1706013947157.JavaMail.zimbra@imt-atlantique.fr>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2024 16:15:37 +0100
Cc: schc <schc@ietf.org>, lp-wan <lp-wan@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 728666137.73627-a8dd1eba368c10552568ff193fb1b3f8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D94C6CE1-784D-4592-9846-2479868FFA06@tzi.org>
References: <1414215348.5937431.1706013947157.JavaMail.zimbra@imt-atlantique.fr>
To: Alexander PELOV <alexander.pelov@imt-atlantique.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/LKaIp1XzW4qUudZ_BrA7i61k3So>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] Call for adoption of IP Protocol Number (draft-moskowitz-intarea-schc-ip-protocol-number)
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2024 15:15:49 -0000

On 2024-01-23, at 13:45, Alexander PELOV <alexander.pelov@imt-atlantique.fr> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> This is a call to adopt as a SCHC WG document. Please express support or opposition with a rationale either way.
> 
> As a reminder, we discussed the need to move the draft from IntArea to SCHC during IETF 118. This is the call to confirm this.
> 
> The latest version can be found here :
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moskowitz-intarea-schc-ip-protocol-number/

I support adoption.
This is parallel to what we had to do for ROHC in RFC 5856/5858.

Grüße, Carsten