IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lp-wan] Next steps on LPWAN WG

Lorenzo Vangelista <lorenzo.vangelista@patavinatech.com> Thu, 25 May 2017 14:11 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo.vangelista@patavinatech.com>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF17129AAA for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 May 2017 07:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=patavinatech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tgZNZ1kxw2lw for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 May 2017 07:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4AA7129530 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 May 2017 07:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id e127so106977768wmg.1 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 May 2017 07:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=patavinatech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=i9lXriGS7R3XFhQ2esHA2+SlG2/ljGsMeHcHgS+IBFE=; b=WZmqTVfuOiKCJx46UmbTdhEMNapd/enTa8aXMBd5VkuSVA0cYin7DOYZoCzp2zLgqQ ZwcJlgUAqCt9sq2ymEdQ8sC2ChEQfJinizFwJXS9TwnHSYrqI5gwYt0IqxChwxBaWpry 8d5vMLh1PzNICS8HhqGHB1XjP8ZtbOEgZUjXhMMx17/grreou8O/+yq/UgWvr6/DFMuF FDe+3fGF35sgaazL0nnbIJpClvo7QfdUV2RPlkcP2kmuAK90cmRbdqxgME1PvtjshTAT PmDeDg+f2ESXfz0ni4WsbCPxgk9k87DCIFmLzXwIrxgVLPUPkjffGiAgdXN+zrSDSr7j J7nQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=i9lXriGS7R3XFhQ2esHA2+SlG2/ljGsMeHcHgS+IBFE=; b=uU7GXd9Sq7tCc1T4PTVf1wbLXtXurYsIzt8ZNFfoAxP4GbChYAHuWEzeiSwGV5nVPZ mme0OD2mZXXOowKyRwv+0fgEFK+WO+7kXoNhtLzE6kxwIcQ+GGz4ulhbVWiOvmf53GK8 ToFB9dYmujREjLoIlwogZFOVmZ4CG+s7c0qwOB+1fzx0fogtUcDrSNu0dgB/buL1OIY0 0Eocxb4A1S/r2myeneqcnLMgu4r8ghhebigniDrnlC3LoT64jk0T4IO5bv/lO+UDH01d XvMuMMIOe2Mj2uePxscdQo20+8X2WG23bw1tiDydR8O8/i+NN1vYT8W+Fpd0w3bfx8Dy yMfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcB13NX0go+TlnEe+lBVZzUN0wLQ4m/Ek8JppkjknlgcW2v9i5QZ L/Gwtx0Hsc/AjwSVfVwBHg==
X-Received: by 10.28.23.131 with SMTP id 125mr9713247wmx.42.1495721506221; Thu, 25 May 2017 07:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.8.8.21] ([185.183.104.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l1sm9204054wrl.15.2017.05.25.07.11.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 May 2017 07:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0144A094-7C51-4E17-9691-90CA481A7749"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Lorenzo Vangelista <lorenzo.vangelista@patavinatech.com>
X-Mailbutler-Link-Tracking-Uuid:
In-Reply-To: <337D2F1B-1751-4A49-8773-082A8C5BBE11@ackl.io>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 16:11:31 +0200
Cc: lp-wan <lp-wan@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <74DB7381-5C61-4067-B5CF-C5AB77A1C8B9@patavinatech.com>
References: <337D2F1B-1751-4A49-8773-082A8C5BBE11@ackl.io>
To: Ana Minaburo <ana@ackl.io>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/R2ZaNwjXqY_XSuQPUjkThnooqhU>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] Next steps on LPWAN WG
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 14:11:50 -0000

+1 ICMP

Lorenzo 
> On 24 May 2017, at 17:24, Ana Minaburo <ana@ackl.io> wrote:
> 
> Hello LPWANers,
> 
> What I would like to talk about you during the meeting is about the future of the WG. As soon as the work is going on, and the Milestone are done we need to start thinking about what are the next steps we need to do and which are the most urgent. 
> 
> I start a possible list of some of them, but I would like to know what do you think and what will be the priorities to the ML. The list is not in any order neither in priority so this is only some ideas, and if you want to add something the list is open.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Ana
> 
> 
> Next Steps on LPWAN WG:
> 
> - YANG data modelling for SCHC 
> - Profile Technologies. Develop the different document for each technology in order to define the different parameters.
> - Security, all the security solution for the LPWAN
> - Rules-ID’s management
> 	+ Use to identify some specific cases:
> 		* Fragmentation
>                 * Format Values
>                 * Rule-IDs dedicated for some specific cases as CBOR structure representation, fragmentation, etc
> 		* The way to use the Rule-Id and their configuration       	
> - ICMP Compression
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lp-wan mailing list
> lp-wan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email