Re: [lp-wan] draft text for rechartering; Comments please!
Ana Minaburo <anaminaburo@gmail.com> Tue, 07 February 2023 09:57 UTC
Return-Path: <anaminaburo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE3BC151557 for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 01:57:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UqYrmgbY2p5K for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 01:57:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20FF1C151556 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 01:57:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id v17so16025444qto.3 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 01:57:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MAacr8URTsGfrwhH+3UL38xW2Ny+2OeETAeHVi0AN60=; b=JgWQ4QoOgpQlH2Z3ux37vrIOXIzSPGs7cM8b/YPNLyXvQKc+/vUPUkaARNH8QZpU45 4+vH3RV5yrNHI0+s702QotRffQxMFv4jlQdF8btB9fIJDHtzJo889QnFW83NXHQX9Wy1 XNa1QZe++P8fY7/byJrOxL1BMXBVgWI1MoHewdkYuxMyVhx9Ln2aogh6xt0kGIb4Bnkj mgOzYVpCqyqh2msFDK2Ym8Ir+iVeBWYEm4QkrpE7CbO0J9FLa6zXohf/oyMaGTq9o/hu I+cD6OPcXlgmuB3lcM7DCW5WG2d4dSxvepDpsc9wy07/cqpC7VDDnZhHpynwT3Nbh92c SSuw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=MAacr8URTsGfrwhH+3UL38xW2Ny+2OeETAeHVi0AN60=; b=uKKp5picpDFs8NQeL5Pt7qP4p4+H64ueoeX5t+YeRfX+wGlMYFtAdeJxoiJCmnM5YK bd2M56AUcBkDjrWwdNR0YH5N6eUTq3xxW5WhYir/GmfFOWIJD8cZbdzKpEXlrkMer1LK MHK3UPN1dMhwm0qbZHXEMDX7YA4YPY0ofqeiUKgRt0z7QHS3TAikL9TGoPMW1c0djxOp Sc1MM5uYWuj/5Y2AD8xcgVmyRCVYjQTZk9S2CiOQv6TuIxkzMGgoTbSmx8+SD28NK+T/ uIRp7b2uBnzJhATiwMGGzCAqiGpyxSAKNzqQUoXAh+QtrVgqdl9z4O9+Vn9K5DXHUpa1 V0VQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUA4ZFAdgZm7UoMAbCyDq8IWzPzsL+pOjNT1Hg0Gmruub4N45XO lhn/BMX2w7aef01EvcfNIZup7EUidUDUZIge5e6ozxfN
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+i+5nkRHdycmzJGZxxDOg3DepR2VXvag5kJBt6bW03RtLG70HrLcc55FYdtBVGILDlhfMpQTK+VkegwZ8wheA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1791:b0:3b9:358a:989f with SMTP id s17-20020a05622a179100b003b9358a989fmr431066qtk.86.1675763825658; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 01:57:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CO1PR11MB48812EB003892E292A5248F5D8D09@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB48812EB003892E292A5248F5D8D09@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Reply-To: anaminaburo@gmail.com
From: Ana Minaburo <anaminaburo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 10:56:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOPRf-fmswGdG=iwH1sKFAxQAPhTuqUTVLaHaSg0_9Ep8OSohQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "lp-wan@ietf.org" <lp-wan@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008e4f4e05f4192b9a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/XuaFgC5MpDYapiGWU2XiAKGSmEQ>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] draft text for rechartering; Comments please!
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 09:57:08 -0000
Dear Pascal, Thank you for the new charter text. I agree with you On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 4:45 PM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert= 40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Daer all: > > Please find the proposed charter text (*) that we built during the last 3 > interim meetings. Please let us know if you have issues with this text > within the next 7 days. Once the document is stable, we (chairs) will ask > our AD (Eric) to push it for IESG review. > > Many thanks! > > The chairs > > (*) draft charter text: > > Background (to be removed) for IESG > > The initial focus of the LPWAN Working Group was to enable IPv6 > connectivity over the following selection of Low-Power Wide-Area (LPWA) > technologies: SIGFOX, LoRa, WI-SUN and NB-IOT. As a result of the first > round of chartering, the IETF has contributed to LPWA technologies by > allowing IPv6 connectivity with to the SCHC deep compression protocol. SCHC > is now becoming an accepted industry standard in that space and is being or > was already adopted by major alliances. > > The group produced documents providing an overview of the baseline LPWA > technologies (RFC8376) as well as a document specifying a Generic Framework > for Static Context Header Compression and Fragmentation (SCHC) [RFC8724], > SCHC for CoAP [RFC8824], SCHC over LPWA technologies for LoRA, SigFox, and > NB-IOT, and the SCHC data model specification. Though the LPWA technologies > were used as the baseline technologies for the LPWAN SCHC standard , > interest is now rising to employ SCHC in other, non-LPWA environments. > > > New (proposed) Charter > > > > The scope of the group is to enable the benefits of the SCHC technology to > LPWAN and non-LPWA networks, including Low Power devices such as > zero-energy / scavenging devices that may operate in Delay Tolerant mode. > To that effect, the group will provide specifications for the application > of SCHC over Foo, where Foo includes but is not limited to UDP tunnels, IP, > PPP, and Ethernet. > > To extend SCHC over multihop networks with remote endpoints, there is a > need in the data plane to signal the SCHC session and some operational > values in the packets. For instance, the INT-AREA WG is working on a SCHC > protocol type for IP and a SCHC Ethertype (in coordination with IEEE) for > Ethernet. The group will provide standard track specifications for a SCHC > Header that conveys the SCHC Session Info over IP for the SCHC protocol > type. > > A complete SCHC solution also requires control plane technologies to > secure the operations and manage the SCHC sessions, devices, and gateways. > The group will provide specifications to identify the rule sets and > negotiate the associated parameters between the pair of endpoints in a > secure fashion. The group will also work on the installation of the rules, > including the instantiation of generic rules to the nodes and networks in > which they are applied. > > The group will continue activities of the previous charter and take on new > work as follows: > > >From the previous charter: > -------------------------- > 1) Perform SCHC Maintenance, including enabling SCHC mechanisms for Upper > layer Protocols, and providing additional reliability mechanisms such as > FEC for fragments. > > 2) Produce a Standards Track document to enable operations, administration > and maintenance (OAM) to the LPWAN device, including support for delayed or > proxied liveness verification (Ping). > > New work items for this charter: > -------------------------------- > 3) Produce Standard Track documents for SCHC over Foo and Bar over SCHC > where Foo includes but is not limited to IP, PPP, and Ethernet and Bar may > include IPv4, ICMPv6-based protocols, TCP, IP tunnels, DLMS, and other > protocols over CoAP such as LwM2M; define and maintain data models for the > protocols supported by SCHC. > > 4) Define the SCHC Protocol Header to convey SCHC Session Info over IP for > the SCHC protocol type > > 5) Produce Standard Track documents for SCHC Rule Discovery and Parameter > Negotiation, including the specification of how work from the IETF Security > Area is leveraged to secure these operations > > 6) Produce Standard Track documents for SCHC Rule Installation, including > the specification of generic SCHC rules that can be instantiated, e.g., to > apply to a certain node or within a certain network. > > The LPWAN WG will collaborate with INT Area WGs for the protocol type > definition and possible Bar-over-SCHC activities. It will work with the > relevant Security Area WGs to secure the SCHC session appropriately. > > _______________________________________________ > lp-wan mailing list > lp-wan@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan >
- [lp-wan] draft text for rechartering; Comments pl… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [lp-wan] draft text for rechartering; Comment… Ana Minaburo