[lp-wan] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-13: (with COMMENT)

[Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The TSV-ART review flagged a problem with
draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc (Thanks Joe) which is a normative
dependency but is already in RFC editor state. Ben also already captured this
in his ballot. I also think it would be important to address this problem
before final publication (of both docs) and the TSV ADs will coordinate with
the INT ADs on this.

Minor comment:
Sec 7.3:
"   The Outer SCHC Rules (Figure 16) MUST process the OSCORE Options
   fields. "
The example section should probably not have normative language.